Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    MIDWEST, USA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    0

    Green vs. Efficiency



    Recently I started preventative maintain for a customer, which happens to be a pharmaceutical manufacturer. The customer informed me of the company’s soon to be new policy of Natural Refrigerants. This would mean that their chilled water plant with five centrifugals equaling to 3,050 tons of cooling (R-123 & R-134a chillers) would have to switch over to ammonia or to absorption equipment.
    I can see a why company would like to go ‘Green’, but to give up the efficiency of the existing equipment, has me scratching my head.

    Anyone care to share their thoughts?

    ChillyWilley



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    63
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Green vs. Efficiency

    Scrapping a working efficient system for a new system is not ecologically sound. The environmental cost of the new system would be larger than that of the remainder of the life of the old system.

    I also did not think that ammonia is very environmentaly friendly?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,843
    Rep Power
    21

    Re: Green vs. Efficiency

    Quote Originally Posted by Stev View Post
    Scrapping a working efficient system for a new system is not ecologically sound. The environmental cost of the new system would be larger than that of the remainder of the life of the old system.

    I also did not think that ammonia is very environmentaly friendly?

    Initial instalation costs aside Ammonia is one
    of the most effiecient and environmentally friendly refigerants available.

    R134a is one of the most ineffiecient and unfriendly to the environment ever. More than 80% of 134a produced has escaped to the atmosphere and it has a C02 equivalent of 1400.

    Ammonia is the way to go. Its just humans it hates

    taz.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,702
    Rep Power
    47

    Re: Green vs. Efficiency

    Quote Originally Posted by Stev View Post
    Scrapping a working efficient system for a new system is not ecologically sound. The environmental cost of the new system would be larger than that of the remainder of the life of the old system.

    I also did not think that ammonia is very environmentaly friendly?
    Stev your comments are completely sound.
    Apart from the last one! Ammonia is a totally Natural substance.
    Therefore the only time it is environmentally unfriendly
    is when some idiot puts it down a drain.

    Incidentally you need a third less power to obtain the same output as a *****.
    From personal experience no-one discharges ammonia or is cavalier with its release.
    Which is more than you can say for some of it's rivals!
    Grizzly

Similar Threads

  1. The Trends of Energy Efficiency Development in Euro
    By RayWang in forum Fundamentals
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-06-2008, 08:54 AM
  2. energy efficiency issue
    By Lc_shi in forum Fundamentals
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-03-2007, 02:17 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 24-07-2006, 03:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •