Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Norfolk - England
    Posts
    95
    Rep Power
    17

    'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)



    To all,

    your views & opinions are welcome......

    Whilst fixing a electrical fault on a resonable size control panel recently (low temp freezer store with 4 x copeland 30HP comps) in a processing factory, the site electrician asked if all 'fridge engineers' were suitablbly electrically qualified & would we be taking the 17th edition update course.

    Now many of my collegues are not electrically trained as such (City & Guilds i mean).

    The question i pose is 'Should we be 17th edition sparkys' to work on electrical control gear?

    This could be splits?, VRV or 100kW + drive motors etc?

    Regards Billy Ray



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Doncaster, England
    Posts
    199
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Billy Ray,

    you don't have to have 17th Edition qualification - that being said, everything you do electrically has to be done to the 17th Edition regulations from July 2008, ignorance of the regs is no excuse.

    So therefore you need to know what the regs say.
    Tony

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    327
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    I have had similar encounters with electricians stomping about and bleating on about the regs. As a result I went on the part p course and have just done the 17th edition course. later this year I will be doing the inspection and testing course. I am looking forward to telling the next site electrician who starts on about 'the regs' to shove off. However, I now realise how little I knew and would agree with Tony, if you cant work and test to the regs, you could end up in trouble.

  4. #4
    Brian_UK's Avatar
    Brian_UK is offline Moderator I am starting to push the Mods: of RE Site Moderator : and general nice guy
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Dorset
    Age
    76
    Posts
    11,025
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    I don't know the answer to that one Billy Ray but I wonder where the 'split' comes if there is one.

    Is the control panel classed as a single component as far as the electrician is concerned. By that I mean when the panel was supplied and erected did the electrician bring in the mains power cable to the isolator and say "There you go mate, all done" or did he then perform a full operation test of the panel to ensure that it complies with the Regulations etc.

    Likewise was your 'fault' something that would have been found by an electrician or would it need a fridgey/electrician to find it.
    Brian - Newton Abbot, Devon, UK
    Retired March 2015

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Norfolk - England
    Posts
    95
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Thanks all for your thoughts,

    I'm with you Brian, not knowing where the 'split' is between fridge engineer & electrician.

    The problem was a 'welded-in' defrost contactor which i know the site electrician would have no idea how to diagnose, its a fridge engineers job to fix!!

    Generally, most sparkys know about distribution & power supplies etc.

    I always consider the fridge to be a specalised piece of kit & explain that we look after the plant from the control panel. The electricians job is to get power to the panel & 'we do the rest'. Thats where i consider the 'split' to be.

    Billy Ray

  6. #6
    Brian_UK's Avatar
    Brian_UK is offline Moderator I am starting to push the Mods: of RE Site Moderator : and general nice guy
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Dorset
    Age
    76
    Posts
    11,025
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Well that makes two of us Billy, now to convince the others
    Last edited by Brian_UK; 30-03-2008 at 11:19 PM. Reason: Spelling
    Brian - Newton Abbot, Devon, UK
    Retired March 2015

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    327
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    There is no 'split'.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Lancs, UK
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Ray View Post
    Thanks all for your thoughts,

    I'm with you Brian, not knowing where the 'split' is between fridge engineer & electrician.

    The problem was a 'welded-in' defrost contactor which i know the site electrician would have no idea how to diagnose, its a fridge engineers job to fix!!

    Generally, most sparkys know about distribution & power supplies etc.

    I always consider the fridge to be a specalised piece of kit & explain that we look after the plant from the control panel. The electricians job is to get power to the panel & 'we do the rest'. Thats where i consider the 'split' to be.

    Billy Ray
    to be fair, their are electrical engineers and their are electrical installers-electrical engineers would easily find a welded in contactor-most installers would not find it at all, as far as i'm aware the wiring regs are largely concerned with fixed installations only (wiring from the board upto the equipment/appliance) allthough the regs are referred to for current carrying capacities of wires and circuit protection, nothing else really is due to specialised components being used in machinery or equipment produced around the world and installed in the UK. I think this is where the CE mark comes in

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    327
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    The whole installation should comply with the regs, to the board or from the board. The appendices list relevant BSEN numbers for circuit components.
    Last edited by Contactor; 02-04-2008 at 08:41 PM. Reason: 11//ggt:0088

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Lancs, UK
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Ray View Post
    To all,

    your views & opinions are welcome......

    Whilst fixing a electrical fault on a resonable size control panel recently (low temp freezer store with 4 x copeland 30HP comps) in a processing factory, the site electrician asked if all 'fridge engineers' were suitablbly electrically qualified & would we be taking the 17th edition update course.

    Now many of my collegues are not electrically trained as such (City & Guilds i mean).

    The question i pose is 'Should we be 17th edition sparkys' to work on electrical control gear?

    This could be splits?, VRV or 100kW + drive motors etc?

    Regards Billy Ray
    Back to the question, no you dont have to hold the 17th edition cert to work on control gear

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    327
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Agreed, neither the regs nor the certificate are statutory.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Norfolk - England
    Posts
    95
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Contactor / Malcoa,

    your views reassure me, & are in line with mine.

    I will know research more the regs, to ensure that my practices (which are generally high standard) follow the 'laid down' standards of the up & coming 17th!!

    Billy ray

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    England
    Age
    54
    Posts
    273
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    no no and no

  14. #14
    Brian_UK's Avatar
    Brian_UK is offline Moderator I am starting to push the Mods: of RE Site Moderator : and general nice guy
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Dorset
    Age
    76
    Posts
    11,025
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by philfridge View Post
    no no and no
    Would you care to explain your terse comment ?
    Brian - Newton Abbot, Devon, UK
    Retired March 2015

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    England
    Age
    54
    Posts
    273
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Ok yes i will elaborate the answer to the question is no , you are a fridge engineer not a electrician. So only a new electrical installation needs 17th edition

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    327
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 'To be' or 'Not to be' (17th edition)

    Any mods to any circuit should be up to 17th ed. standard.

Similar Threads

  1. modern refrigeration and air con 18th edition
    By airconadam in forum Refrigeration Books
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 05-02-2011, 05:58 AM
  2. Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists, Second Edition
    By chillin out in forum Refrigeration Books
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 19-05-2010, 04:38 PM
  3. 17th edition
    By N.Lewis in forum Electrical
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-01-2008, 03:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •