Results 1 to 28 of 28
Thread: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen
Hybrid View
-
14-11-2010, 09:51 PM #1
Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen
The specific heat of nitrogen is 1kJ/kg.K
The heat required to vapourise, or sublime if necessary - if you have been vacuuming for too long before the trip-vac process, water is 2.5kJ/gram.
So if the nitrogen is 1K warmer than the free water and all of that 1kg comes into contact with the free water then it would vapourise less than half a gram.
The problem is the nitrogen expands into the system causing a temperature there actually colder than the water or ice is.
So how does it all work?
-
14-11-2010, 10:09 PM #2
Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen
The expansion of the nitrogen is the joule thompson effect,
How ever whilst the nitrogen is being introduced it is picking energy up from the thermal mass of the system. thus adding energy to the system.
If you are adding 1Kg of nitrogen, approx 0.8m3, you are looking a an system thermal mass of in excess of 100kg, so the nitrogen would warm close to the mass temperature, which inturn would add energy to the free H2O. On a system like this we should be talking about removing grams of water, not KGs of water. (that then becomes a different kettle of fish), then I would use heat and velocity pressure to remove large excesses
-
14-11-2010, 10:19 PM #3
Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen
Okay, say the 1kg of nitrogen warms up to 20°C being the ambient temperature. And the free water in the system is at -11°C (frozen) and is 1 gram in weight.
The 1kg of nitrogen would be able to pass 31kJ of heat to that gram of moisture. But how much actually comes in contact with the 1 gram of moisture? How much does the ice actually subcool on account of the rise in system pressure? Does the heat cause more vaporisation than the pressure causes subcooling?
-
14-11-2010, 10:28 PM #4
-
14-11-2010, 10:32 PM #5
-
14-11-2010, 10:40 PM #6
-
14-11-2010, 11:12 PM #7
Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen
Yes, time is a part of the question - but a fundamental part of the question. We know that the vacuum pump on it's own - with multiple oil changes and/or a cold-trap will work well - given time - but we want it all speeded up - so we come along with this nitrogen idea. The question is "Is it more effective in removing free water than is simply vacuuming with heat and time?"
My conclusions from recent experiences is that simply time and heat are required and not any interference with nitrogen.
On larger systems blowing hot air through the the unit works best.
Here's a picture from my trip to the Carrier factory in Lyon.
Similar Threads
-
Triple evacuation
By kpapa in forum FundamentalsReplies: 32Last Post: 22-02-2010, 10:35 PM -
Nitrogen Condensing by Temperarture
By Reflexive in forum Technical DiscussionsReplies: 0Last Post: 21-12-2008, 12:23 AM -
measuring vacuum
By nadeem majeed in forum FundamentalsReplies: 12Last Post: 09-11-2008, 11:03 AM -
Triple evacuation on split system
By batfink in forum Technical DiscussionsReplies: 10Last Post: 05-10-2008, 01:11 PM -
EPA 608 Cert. Evacuation and Confusion on EPA Exam
By hvactech in forum TrainingReplies: 3Last Post: 12-09-2008, 04:07 AM