Results 1 to 28 of 28

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Age
    50
    Posts
    708
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    nitrogen or OFN is free of oxygen which is a content of water / moisture
    In lay mans terms think of swiping a dry sponge through a bath of water
    it ends up wet and its easier to remove wet OFN which is moist than is is to remove pure water as the OFN carries the water

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    624
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    Quote Originally Posted by Quality View Post
    nitrogen or OFN is free of oxygen which is a content of water / moisture
    In lay mans terms think of swiping a dry sponge through a bath of water
    it ends up wet and its easier to remove wet OFN which is moist than is is to remove pure water as the OFN carries the water
    So the nitrogen being free of oxygen has some imortance because oxygen is a component of the water molecule? I wonder how this has importance?

    Does the OFN operate as a sponge or as a broom?

    Why did we use, say, R22 on R22 plant, back a few decades ago, to perform a tripple vac - why did we not use OFN back then already?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Age
    50
    Posts
    708
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    I can not comment as I have never used R22 as purge gas

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    North East England
    Age
    41
    Posts
    712
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    Quote Originally Posted by DTLarca View Post
    So the nitrogen being free of oxygen has some imortance because oxygen is a component of the water molecule? I wonder how this has importance?

    Does the OFN operate as a sponge or as a broom?

    Why did we use, say, R22 on R22 plant, back a few decades ago, to perform a tripple vac - why did we not use OFN back then already?
    The importance of N2 being oxygen free is that oxygen can react violently with oil and cause explosion

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    624
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    Quote Originally Posted by james10 View Post
    The importance of N2 being oxygen free is that oxygen can react violently with oil and cause explosion
    Sure - but that statement seems to come from a position that assumes there is a real purpose and even a real need for tripple evacuation. I'm sort of asking why do so many people assume that tripple evacuation with nitrogen is even necessary.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    england
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,853
    Rep Power
    46

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    Quote Originally Posted by DTLarca View Post
    I'm sort of asking why do so many people assume that tripple evacuation with nitrogen is even necessary.
    Sure, but what proof do you have that so many people belive this to be necessary?

    I think it is left over from when single stage vac pumps were more common

    Jon

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    624
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    Quote Originally Posted by monkey spanners View Post
    Sure, but what proof do you have that so many people belive this to be necessary?

    I think it is left over from when single stage vac pumps were more common

    Jon
    You're right - I don't have inductive evidence but rather only abductive evidence - the sort Sherlocke Holmes used as opposed to the sort an election exit pollster would use

    But that seems a good point regarding single stage pumps.

    But then why would they rely of triple-vac when using single stage pumps?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    england
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,853
    Rep Power
    46

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    Quote Originally Posted by DTLarca View Post
    But that seems a good point regarding single stage pumps.

    But then why would they rely of triple-vac when using single stage pumps?
    I think they used to break the vacuum with refrigerant. That way if the pump only gets out 98% on each vac by the third one there is very little air left in. I think the moisture thing is a bit of a red herring.

    People also tend to think if one of something is good then more must be better.

    There may be a case of people not wanting to appear lax in their working practices so they claim to do what they think or have heard is best practice. I for example never ever braze without ofn...


    I have found on systems that are taking a long time to vacuuming that putting a few bar of ofn in and starting again helps speed things along, i suspect the slowness is due to refrigerant disolved in the oil and the ofn going in stirs the oil up a bit (often movement can be seen in the comp sight glass for example)

    Jon

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    232
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: Triple Evacuation with Nitrogen

    Quote Originally Posted by DTLarca View Post
    So the nitrogen being free of oxygen has some imortance because oxygen is a component of the water molecule? I wonder how this has importance?

    Does the OFN operate as a sponge or as a broom?

    Why did we use, say, R22 on R22 plant, back a few decades ago, to perform a tripple vac - why did we not use OFN back then already?
    A long time ago all the refrigerants were Cheap in todays terms.
    Also the triple evacuation was also described as a dilution method for large systems.
    You must appreciate that Vac pump are so much better than they were years ago.
    You might not appreciate this but when most commercial plant was open drive we did not have vac pumps, we used the system compressor to evacuate the system.
    On large systems it was not possible to reduce moisture to the level we now consider acceptable and the triple or dilution method was the industry norm.
    It meant reducing the system to the lowest vacuum you could achieve and adding refrigerant to absorb non condensible and then evacuate again the dilute the residual non condensible constituents.
    Don't forget we did not know then that we were environment criminals, it was we all did.
    It was the norm to vent service cylinders to reduce the pressure so you could recharge them.

    How time change.

Similar Threads

  1. Triple evacuation
    By kpapa in forum Fundamentals
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 22-02-2010, 10:35 PM
  2. Nitrogen Condensing by Temperarture
    By Reflexive in forum Technical Discussions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21-12-2008, 12:23 AM
  3. measuring vacuum
    By nadeem majeed in forum Fundamentals
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-11-2008, 11:03 AM
  4. Triple evacuation on split system
    By batfink in forum Technical Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-10-2008, 01:11 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-09-2008, 04:07 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •