Results 1 to 34 of 34
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Weihai,China
    Posts
    807
    Rep Power
    20

    sewage heat pump issue



    Hi sirs
    Sewage heat pump can save much energy and there're some project here in my country. I know there's no very special tech but I don't know what type heat exchanger is for the sewage water.
    Who've done this kind of job would share us something,pls


    regards
    LC


    I hear...I forget;I see...I remember;I do...I understand

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Merate (LC) - Italy
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,554
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Please explain what type of sewage it is, and how much solid is inside of it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Hi LC,

    The project I worked on used a simple shell & tube heat exchanger for the chiller and condenser (about 15 years ago).

    The water that was flowing through the chiller was the grey water (I think this is the correct term) from the sewage treatment system. It is essentially clean water (all solids removed), but non-potable.

    All of the solids and and other material were removed before the water flowed to the chiller.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British West Indies
    Posts
    545
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Sounds like you were reclaiming heat from a clarified or treated effluent.

    I remember a documentary with some footage from Sweden where they were talking about reclaiming heat from sewers.

    Some documentary got into bio gas from manure as well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Yep, the sewage was the clarified effluent discharge.

    Sweden does have a very large heat pump system which uses centrifugal compressors in the heat pump. Basically, it is just a big centrifugal water chiller.

    On the bio-gas system... Was this being used for co-generation and combustion turbines? There might be some refrigeration required to condition (dehumidify) the methane before it is used. Have worked on some of these too.
    Last edited by US Iceman; 30-08-2006 at 01:54 AM. Reason: corrected text

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Weihai,China
    Posts
    807
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    This system uses non-treated sewage water,only with two levels filter before entering heat exchanger. I'm not sure if the normal shell-tube HX is no problem.

    regards
    LC
    I hear...I forget;I see...I remember;I do...I understand

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Hi LC,

    I would say the shell & tube exchanger is more forgiving in this application as the tubes would be easily cleaned. The project in Sweden does have shell & tube heat exchangers used on it I believe.

    If there is a chance of minor particles or sediment, the tube velocity should be maintained at least 6 to 8 feet per second (1.8 to 2.4 meters per second) to provide a cleaning action on the tube ID.

    The fouling factor should also be increased above the limits used for HVAC applications to also provide some additional run-time between cleanings too.

    If the shell & tube exchanger is fabricated with channel heads and covers, the cover plate can be removed quickly to allow the tubes to be cleaned quickly.

    The application of any heat exchanger is based on the application. If the fluid has solids or will accumulate material, then the system is dependent on the filters used. There are some centrifugal separators that can be blown down on a regular basis to maintain effectiveness of the seperators.

    If filters are used, perhaps they should be provided with mechanical scrapers to keep the filters clean for longer periods of time.

    Do you have any written material in English that may describe the heat pump you are thinking of?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue


  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    china
    Posts
    98
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British West Indies
    Posts
    545
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by US Iceman View Post
    Yep, the sewage was the clarified effluent discharge.

    Sweden does have a very large heat pump system which uses centrifugal compressors in the heat pump. Basically, it is just a big centrifugal water chiller.

    On the bio-gas system... Was this being used for co-generation and combustion turbines? There might be some refrigeration required to condition (dehumidify) the methane before it is used. Have worked on some of these too.
    The Biogas was from manure on a large dairy farm maybe 3,000 head.

    It was treating the waste and producing the gas to replace propane. They seemed to find ways to use up as much of the biogas as they could but ended up burning a lot of it off.

    They added greenhouses and heated with biogas, they ran stills made enthanol, but I do not rexall them generating electricity with it.

    A starch plant in my hometown was forced to treat their effluent. They used an anerobic digestor to treat the waste and appease environmental concerns. It produced a substantial amount of gas, but it did not pay for itself. Was a smaller scale than 3000 crapping cows I guess.
    Last edited by Abby Normal; 30-08-2006 at 05:09 AM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    If I recall this properly, methane is a bad greenhouse gas. Supposedly worse than CO2.

    I wonder why cows were not legislated in the refrigerant protocols?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by US Iceman View Post
    The fouling factor should also be increased above the limits used for HVAC applications to also provide some additional run-time between cleanings too.
    It used to crack me up that the US tables of fouling factors started with distilled water (FF=0.0005 if I remember correctly) and went all the way up to "The Chicago Sanitary Canal" at 0.008 (imperial units). The second worst after the CSC according to the table was the East River, NYC - must be all the ex-mobsters swimming with the fishes in their concrete overshoes!

    Another laugh is that the Americans call imperial units "English units" - we've been blaming the English for all sorts of things for years!

    Thanks for the memories
    Cheers
    Andy P

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Merate (LC) - Italy
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,554
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by US Iceman View Post
    If I recall this properly, methane is a bad greenhouse gas. Supposedly worse than CO2.

    I wonder why cows were not legislated in the refrigerant protocols?
    GWP of CO2 is 1 by definition of GWP
    GWP of CH4 (methane) is 23
    GWP of R134a is 1300

    GWP =global warming potential

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British West Indies
    Posts
    545
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Supposedly the worst greenhouse gas is water vapour, when you consider how much there is

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy P
    It used to crack me up that the US tables of fouling factors started with distilled water (FF=0.0005 if I remember correctly) and went all the way up to "The Chicago Sanitary Canal" at 0.008 (imperial units).
    I've seen similar tables as to the one you describe. If I remember right, they date back to about the 1950's or 60's. And, they were very, very conservative.

    I guess I'm a little curious about the comment though. Do you think I was in error by suggesting a slightly higher fouling factor to allow for increased run-time between cleanings?

    It is common practice to make allowances for differentiating between the fouling factors used for open and closed loop systems and potential fluid contamination on process systems.

    I suppose I would like to hear more about your concerns Andy.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Weihai,China
    Posts
    807
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    GWP of CO2 is 1 by definition of GWP
    GWP of CH4 (methane) is 23
    GWP of R134a is 1300

    GWP =global warming potential
    Maybe ODP is more concerned
    CH4 ODP = 0
    R134a =0
    R22 = 0.034
    ODP = ozone depleting potential
    I hear...I forget;I see...I remember;I do...I understand

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Merate (LC) - Italy
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,554
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by US Iceman View Post
    I guess I'm a little curious about the comment though. Do you think I was in error by suggesting a slightly higher fouling factor to allow for increased run-time between cleanings?
    No, you were not in error. A customer once ordered a seawater/water chiller, so we made it with a special condenser.
    They called us soon after it was commissioned, because it was not working. At first glance we put the blame on the condenser.
    We removed and opened it.
    We found toilet paper and algaes inside.

    At the end of the day we discovered that, yes it was sea water, but pumped from a busy harbour without any gross filtration.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by NoNickName
    ...but pumped from a busy harbour without any gross filtration.
    I believe that was the point in the old fouling factor tables mentioned previously. I think the message here is, water is not always clean. Even closed circuit piping systems.

    I also believe the importance of the fouling recommendations is not the absolute value specified, but that an investigation should take place to determine the exact condition of the water.

    At the very least, some questions should be asked.

    Sometimes we learn this the hard way. Some separate processes may require higher fouling factors to increase the run-time between cleaning.

    This issue of fouling factors is very interesting. They do add expensive heat transfer surface and make the exchanger larger. In a competetive situation, it works against you trying to sell the equipment. Especially if the other companies do not do this.

    That is why I think it is important to explain why you are adding it (fouling factor) and what benefit it adds.

    Thanks for the feedback NoNickName. I would like to hear from others on this too.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by US Iceman View Post
    I guess I'm a little curious about the comment though. Do you think I was in error by suggesting a slightly higher fouling factor to allow for increased run-time between cleanings?
    Hi Iceman - thanks for the comment. This is a tricky subject and I'm no more expert than average. In general I totally agree that river water, harbour water and "waste water" should be assumed to be dirty and the design should include an allowance for fouling. However all that the allowance achieves is a lower figure for overall heat transfer coefficient than you would otherwise have, and hence as you said, a bigger surface area. At first this is clean so the heat transfer is actually better than design and the evap temperature will be a bit higher - then as the cr*p builds up the TD on the heat exchanger widens because the performance diminishes. You are spot on: this does not eliminate the need for cleaning just makes the time interval between cleans a bit longer. However in a bad situation that might mean once every eight days insted of once every seven day!

    My concerns about this approach are:
    1) as the surface fouls and roughens I suspect that the rate of build up increases so paying large amounts for a lot of extra surface might only buy you a little extra time.
    2) keeping the tube velocity up is also good practice, but the combination of higher velocity and particulates in the water could lead to rapid erosion. If you're going to do this then use a tougher tube material such as cupronickel or admiralty brass rather than copper (for *****s) or stainless steel rather than carbon steel (for ammonia)
    3) one problem of increasing fouling factor and getting a bigger heat exchanger is that the flow area probably went up for the revised selection, and unless the number of passes increased the tube velocity would therefore go down.
    4) for me the best approach is good filtration upstream, with tough tubes and fairly high velocity. Unfortunately the filters probably cost more than the increased surface. Ideally a pair of filters with an alternate automatic backflush arrangement to avoid the need for manual cleaning. With this arrangement I'd go for a moderate fouling factor of 0.002 hr.ft2.F/BTU (0.00036 m2K/W) or so

    Cheers
    Andy P

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Merate (LC) - Italy
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,554
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    And: who's going to clean the cr*p out of the fouled damned shell and tube?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy P
    My concerns about this approach are:
    1) as the surface fouls and roughens I suspect that the rate of build up increases so paying large amounts for a lot of extra surface might only buy you a little extra time.
    2) keeping the tube velocity up is also good practice, but the combination of higher velocity and particulates in the water could lead to rapid erosion. If you're going to do this then use a tougher tube material such as cupronickel or admiralty brass rather than copper (for *****s) or stainless steel rather than carbon steel (for ammonia)
    3) one problem of increasing fouling factor and getting a bigger heat exchanger is that the flow area probably went up for the revised selection, and unless the number of passes increased the tube velocity would therefore go down.
    4) for me the best approach is good filtration upstream, with tough tubes and fairly high velocity. Unfortunately the filters probably cost more than the increased surface. Ideally a pair of filters with an alternate automatic backflush arrangement to avoid the need for manual cleaning. With this arrangement I'd go for a moderate fouling factor of 0.002 hr.ft2.F/BTU (0.00036 m2K/W) or so
    I agree with all of this and the methodology completely.

    I think you will agree this is a tricky situation. The harder tubes (and/or possibly greater wall thickness) increases the wall resistance + the increased fouling factor will increase the exchanger cost.

    Personally, I think I would investigate a prime surface ID for ease of cleaning and perhaps an exterior tube surface enhancement to decrease the exchanger size. However, this would all be based on the exact nature of the resulting film coefficients and the penalty forced by the increase in resistance of the other "corrections" (wall thickness & material conductivity).

    This would make an interesting review of various tubes, materials, and surface enhancements, in an attempt to have the film coefficient ratios (inside to outside) be approx. equal to the surface ratio (inside to outside).

    Even with the design methods used, the continued good operation of this would be predicated upon a regular periodic inspection and possible cleaning of the tubes.

    This type of application, while a chiller, is a long way from the usual field of HVAC systems.
    Last edited by US Iceman; 31-08-2006 at 10:19 PM. Reason: forgot to add original author, Sorry Andy.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by NoNickName
    And: who's going to clean the cr*p out of the fouled damned shell and tube?
    Well... That is part of the issue. Knowing the tubes have a high potential for excess fouling, as a designer you can only do so much.

    Brushes that can be cycled through the tubes can be purchased. Filters can be installed.

    However, the owner has to ensure the equipment is maintained and operating correctly as the designer intended.

    I would rather over-design a system and tell the owner why, than explain why it doesn't work after it has failed.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by US Iceman View Post
    I think you will agree this is a tricky situation. The harder tubes (and/or possibly greater wall thickness) increases the wall resistance + the increased fouling factor will increase the exchanger cost.
    Wall thickness: that's true for st steel vs carbon steel, but not such a big deal for cupronickel as far as I remember.

    Another thing to be wary of when using higher fouling factors is the particularly bad effect of fouling on enhanced tubes. The enhancement gives greatly improved performance when the tube is clean - but the higher up you are, the further you have to fall. If using internally enhanced tubes (eg rifled or wavy) I would put a much heavier fouling factor on (maybe three times as much) - which of course cancels out the benefit of enhancement in heat exchanger size. Better to stick to plain tubes if fouling is a concern

    Cheers
    Andy P

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    And another thing....(I really ought to go to bed!) We had a seawater condenser fail on a quayside job in Norway. When it was opened up we found severe erosion plus a relatively fine grit, which turned out to be the remains of seashells which had gone through the seawater pumps and been smashed up. A fine filter wouldn't have caught them after the pump, but a rough basket upstream would have prevented the problem. They were incredibly abrasive, and really ripped the tubes. You can imagine the rest of the story....

    Cheers
    Andy P

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy P
    The enhancement gives greatly improved performance when the tube is clean - but the higher up you are, the further you have to fall. If using internally enhanced tubes (eg rifled or wavy) I would put a much heavier fouling factor on (maybe three times as much) - which of course cancels out the benefit of enhancement in heat exchanger size.
    You said it better than I tried to. It's been too long since I have really had to do this sort of work.

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy P
    Better to stick to plain tubes if fouling is a concern.
    That's probably about the best advice a person can get for this type of service.

    Have you ever used the HiTran inserts from CalGavin? These little inserts look like paperclips in a string. I have heard they tend to provide a self-cleaning action in the tube ID. I would be interested to learn the experiences of others on this item.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    They were incredibly abrasive, and really ripped the tubes.
    That is another example of how things go wrong with a perfectly good installation. Details, details, details...

    Did the tube erosion occur only at the tube entrance, or along the entire tube length? I suspect the majority of it was at the tube entrance and decreased to a lesser amount down the tube.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue


  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by US Iceman View Post

    Did the tube erosion occur only at the tube entrance, or along the entire tube length? I suspect the majority of it was at the tube entrance and decreased to a lesser amount down the tube.
    Hi Iceman,

    From what I remember there was some erosion on the tube ends, but the burst was part way down a tube and the heavy erosion was quite localised. I concluded at the time that there had probably been something partly blocking the tube which pushed the velocity up even higher at that point. Of course by the time we cut into the condenser the blockage was long gone. Possibly seaweed or plastic or somesuch.

    Regarding Calgavin - we looked at the insert as a possible addition to DX ammonia aircooler tubes a while back, but the pressure drop penalty was too high so it never went ahead. For brine chillers I think they would be most appropriate for viscous fluid, such as glycol at low temperature, but they really push the pressure drop up, so you pay something in pump power. Do you think there would be a risk of erosion if they were used with dirty water? (possible localised high velocity)

    Cheers
    Andy P

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,645
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Just joined this thread.
    There was some 13 to 15 years ago a contest here in Belgium for the most environment saving house and I gave some ideas how I saw it.
    Of course, DX ground source heatpump, heat reclaim on mechanical ventilation (mechanical ventilation has become an obligation in every Belgium house), heat reclaim on the fridge and the sewage heat pump.

    How I saw it? Collecting all the grey water from the house during the day in a small isolated storage tank and retract during the night on cheaper rates the heat out of it with a small compressor. Then let if flow afterwards its normal way to the drain.

    I received a letter that my project was chosen together with 4 others and that they should decide which project was the best. I gave them a call that I hadn't building plans but that it were only some ideas how I saw it in case I should build a house.
    It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Hi Andy,

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy P
    From what I remember there was some erosion on the tube ends, but the burst was part way down a tube and the heavy erosion was quite localised.
    My first guess was the tube erosion was more dominant within the first few centimeters of the tube entrance. The entrance losses and velocity profile would have been the worse here before the flow was fully developed in the tubes.

    But then... I have been known to be wrong before too.

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyP
    we looked at the insert as a possible addition to DX ammonia aircooler tubes a while back
    I have a friend who tried this and said it works great for the first pass of the circuit. He tried these on some liquid overfeed air-cooling evaporators to help break up the liquid refrigerant so that it had better wall contact with the first pass tubes. Sort of a first pass spray system if you will.

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy P
    For brine chillers I think they would be most appropriate for viscous fluid, such as glycol at low temperature, but they really push the pressure drop up, so you pay something in pump power.
    That's for sure... Instead of heat transfer enhancements, it might be more prudent to spend the time looking for a better heat transfer fluid with better properties.

    There have to be some new fluids available with better low temperature viscosities and conductivities. That would provide better Reynolds numbers and film coefficients, and lower pressure losses. Unfortunately, I bet the fluids can tend to be a little expensive.

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy P
    Do you think there would be a risk of erosion if they were used with dirty water? (possible localised high velocity)
    Going from memory I seem to remember the inserts would flex under flow conditions. That was one of the selling features to help keep the tubes clean. You have probably heard all of the other selling points too.

    In short, I'm not sure what would happen. If the particles were somewhat soluble with water, the inserts may be fine. If the particles are abrasive as your project encountered, it may erode the inserts too.

    That is part of the problem with designing equipment and systems. There are so many variables, anyone of which can come back and haunt you.

    Best Regards,
    US Iceman

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Hi Peter,

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter
    Collecting all the grey water from the house during the day in a small isolated storage tank and retract during the night on cheaper rates the heat out of it with a small compressor. Then let if flow afterwards its normal way to the drain.
    That is really interesting Peter. With this idea it might be possible to build a single packaged system for the house for heating and cooling. A coil could be submerged in the storage tank to pull heat out.

    One coil for the refrigerator, one coil for air conditioning, one coil for other heat recovery. This starts to look like a little supermarket refrigeration system.

    One refrigeration system with multiple evaporators.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,645
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    That was in fact the idea: only a copper coil in the unit so that you don’t need any pumps.
    A little bit like the ice bin beer coolers.

    The unit is then installed inside the storage tank and the discharge lines are going inside the building or the unit is inside the building and the lines going to the tank are he suction lines.
    The fact that you have +/- 8 hours to retract the heat makes that you don’t need a big compressor.

    Pure theoretically seen, this device can foresee all the heating or at least the pre-heating of all the domestic hot water because all this wasted energy could be retracted.

    Plastic valves are commercially available. The only problem I could think of was that the valve could block due to the dirt/debris.

    My wife measured for some weeks the flow and the outlet temperature of her fume hood and I calculated that this energy was capable of heating +/- 10 l water a day, just enough to wash the dishes.

    My fridge is now for more then 10 years connected to a timer which bridges the thermostat during the cheap night rates. This Real Time Clock can in fact very easy and cheap be foreseen on the PCB’s already available in most new modern fridges. Via a push-button on the front panel the user then can select eventually this option.

    A client of mine with a big freezer of +/- 15 x 15 x 10 m, stacekd full with vegetables runs his freezer from Friday evening till Monday morning. They’re only in standby during the remaining days.

    Cooling the house: well, if you can pump water coming from the underground in a closed circuit, then you even don't need compressors to cool your house, at least not in our countries. Only a pump.
    Just using the energy of the underground and preheat it for teh winter seson where you can use preheated soil.

    Well, as you see, many ideas, only finding time to make and test this all.
    It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,326
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter
    Well, as you see, many ideas, only finding time to make and test this all.
    I understand. We still have to work to feed the family.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Weihai,China
    Posts
    807
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: sewage heat pump issue

    i believe good ideas is the premise of the new product.
    Peter can apply for a patent

    regards
    LC
    I hear...I forget;I see...I remember;I do...I understand

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •