Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    27
    Rep Power
    0

    Environmental Data Selection



    While designing a new plant, what should be selected values of dry bulb and wet bulb temperature while selecting an evaporative condenser for industrial application operating 24/7. ASHRAE has given its environmental data in Fundamentals as well as below link.
    http://ashrae-meteo.info/index.php?l...%27&wmo=416410

    Generally what environmental conditions are chosen for such application, 0.4%,1%,5%? Are they chosen from design column or monthly column.



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    27
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Environmental Data Selection

    Can anyone share thoughts on this particular matter

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    france
    Age
    64
    Posts
    223
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: Environmental Data Selection

    Hi Rize 1159,
    the usual value chosen by Baltimore, if no request from customer, is the higher WB value in 2% monthly time.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    811
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Environmental Data Selection

    At 0.4% the difference is not significant 29.3C and 30.3C. What is going to be your condensing temperature (pressure)? This is the most important issue.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    3,355
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: Environmental Data Selection

    The piping is just as important as the correct selection of the equipment in multiple condensers.
    This is a good document.



    https://www.evapco.com/sites/evapco.com/files/2018-02/EvapcoPiping%20EvapCond131A.pdf

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    27
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Environmental Data Selection

    Quote Originally Posted by Segei View Post
    At 0.4% the difference is not significant 29.3C and 30.3C. What is going to be your condensing temperature (pressure)? This is the most important issue.
    Without considering your wetbulb, how can we decide condensing temperature and pressure?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    811
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Environmental Data Selection

    Look at this bulletin from Evapco https://www.evapco.com/sites/evapco....bulletin_0.pdf
    Assume that design wet bulb temperature is 86F(30C). Heat rejection factor can be chosen as 2.47 and condensing temperature will be 95F(35C). If you choose heat rejection factor 2.25, condensing temperature will be 96.3F. Heat rejection factor is the most important part to achieve required condensing pressure. In this case I would choose 2.47. This is better for energy efficiency and it will better keep condensing pressure when heat transfer surface deteriorate.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    320
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: Environmental Data Selection

    You answered the fundamental question yourself: A food processing plant operating 24/7 cannot be subject to refrigeration shortages 5% of real time: And you don't know by what extent its going to be short without looking at the 1% and .4% values. If the 5% and 1% are wide spread, say 4-deg C. there is going to be a considerable proportion of real time when your industrial operation is going to be limping badly....On the other hand if this is a cold storage there are certain things that can be done when the weather gets that way to decrease load, but thats not practical with an active process...In most processes, the whole operation becomes a sinkhole for money when the throughput drops even marginally.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    865
    Rep Power
    26

    Re: Environmental Data Selection

    I have been through this before.
    I asked for a quote on a new condenser that operated a Spiral Freezer. On hot days the Screw Loading Percentage would back off due to head pressure (Motor Overload)
    The Contractor insisted it was not worth the money when we only occasionally had an issue.
    We also had a small Nitrogen Tunnel we used for overflow. A Vice President decided without consulting anyone that we should install a larger Tunnel. (Which worked well, until we got the bill for the Nitrogen!)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •