Results 1 to 31 of 31
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    2079 Safe Handling Certificate.



    I was asked recently how do I prove whether an "Engineer" has a Safe Handling Certificate?
    I don't know!
    Short of challenging someone, is it possible to check up on them?
    Grizzly



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    5,078
    Rep Power
    42

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    As I understand it, all "engineers" with 2079 are registered with their firm via 1 of the registration companies, our being Refcom. I'm sure you can ask the registration body to confirm the details of the "engineer" but will buy a round of virtual doughnuts if I'm mistaken.
    I'm back on the Pale

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Thanks Frank for the input.
    What about a single individual working for a company that was in the fridge industry, so dabbles with A/C
    on their sites.
    Grizzly
    Last edited by Grizzly; 29-10-2014 at 11:21 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    South Coast
    Posts
    249
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Grizzly

    Maybe the site has copies of the engineers F Gas pretty sure they have to check all F Gas certificates of anybody carrying out work on site. I would ask the site to ask for his.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    A Good point Gibbo.
    Problem is this guy is employed by the site owners. As I said He works for them on their sites!

    So before I go questioning the customer or one of their own, I was wondering if there is a central register.
    My guess is not! And the whole (2079) "You must be qualified" is an expensive sham!
    This same site buys their own refrigerants!
    Discuss that!
    Grizzly

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    509
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    If the site are buying their own refrigerant then I would have thought that they would have to register with Refcom or does that only apply if you work as a contractor? In which case, they should have submitted the engineers own F-Gas Certificate number. Just done a check with Refcom site and you can find registered company details but not individuals.
    If you can find a CSCS Card number for the engineer, then you can check that online.
    Just tried that, they need far too many details, so that is no good.
    Mobile A/C at its best, see avatar.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    5,078
    Rep Power
    42

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Grizzly

    I found this on the DEFRA website

    Reporting

    If you suspect a business doesn’t have the correct certification or its staff aren’t appropriately qualified, you should contact the Environment Agency’s chemical compliance team at chemicalrestrictions@environment-agency.gov.uk
    Enforcement

    If you don’t comply with the F-gas or ODS Regulations you will be committing an offence and may have enforcement action taken against you, including prosecution.
    Further information

    Contact the Environment Agency’s chemical compliance team atchemicalrestrictions@environment-agency.gov.uk or the Environment Agency’s National Customer Contact Centre on 03708 506 506 for more information on the regulations.
    I'm back on the Pale

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,236
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    .

    https://www.skillcard.org.uk/CheckCard.aspx

    If they were ever registered they should be on this

    Rob

    .
    .. ... -. .----. - / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / --. --- --- -..

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Thanks for the help Guys it is appreciated.
    This issues rather political at present however I have some very useful options for future use.
    Thanks Grizzly
    PS I have spread the love where I am allowed.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Auckland
    Age
    67
    Posts
    3,362
    Rep Power
    31

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Hi Grizzly.
    a dumb question from the other side of the world, does this relate to R717 or ***** based refrigerants.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Hi Magoo
    Not a dumb question when it is from someone on the other side of the world!
    R717 is a separate 2078 Certificate
    2079 is the latest updated 2078 Certificate for *****'s, ozone depleting refrigerants etc.
    I don't remember it having any relevance with Co2 which I think is an all together separate Certificate again.
    Oh! And then their is the "Care" Refrigerants to consider!!!
    Grizzly

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,236
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    .

    In the UK we treat all refrigerants equally (even R718, water), but
    we then expect a little more skill and knowledge regarding specials,
    such as Ammonia, C02 and Hydro Carbons.

    We are legally obliged to hold a refrigerant handling qualification and
    the current version, which has been in place since 2009 is a qualification
    that allows the holder to work on any refrigerant except Ammonia.

    Ammonia is a different qualification and the guys who hold it tend to have
    both the F-gas qual and the Ammonia qual.

    We then treat HC and C02 as specialties and although we are allowed to use
    them and work with them with the normal refrigerant handling qualification,
    the industry like us to have extra quals in the use of these specials.

    In the UK C02 and HC are treated as add ons to the legal qualification and they
    prove industry competance, this is because C02 and HC are nether a Chlorine or
    a Florine based gas, so they do not officially fall under the restrictions of Montreal
    or Kyoto.

    In the UK we tend to treat all refrigerants more or less equally but a little bit of
    extra attention is placed on C02 and HC because they can have issues if not understood.

    Ammonia is treated as a stand alone refrigerant and only specialists tend to work with it.

    Regards

    Rob

    .
    .. ... -. .----. - / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / --. --- --- -..

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    What a brilliant answer Rob!
    You should consider being a Trainer!

    Just joking my Friend.

    Thanks Grizzly.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    ireland
    Age
    48
    Posts
    262
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    It does not seem to matter who has what certificate over here ,wholesalers sell to anybody who wants to buy gas and there does not appear to be any enforcement.The only job the enforcement body appears to do is collect fees.Makes a joke of the whole f-gas thing,it seems to be more about collecting revenue and the nothing to do with the environment.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Quote Originally Posted by joe-ice View Post
    It does not seem to matter who has what certificate over here ,wholesalers sell to anybody who wants to buy gas and there does not appear to be any enforcement.The only job the enforcement body appears to do is collect fees.Makes a joke of the whole f-gas thing,it seems to be more about collecting revenue and the nothing to do with the environment.

    Hi Joe.
    I don't know all the "in's and outs" but surely the wholesalers in Ireland are under the same EU rules that ours are under.
    Which as was discussed on my thread The wholesaler's say Nah! very recently.
    "Ours" are having to provide a usage trail from January and as such the movement and usage of refrigerants,
    has shifted up the System.
    Have a read and see what you think?
    Grizzly

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    telford
    Posts
    1,911
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    I will wait and see what happens in 2015,got all my certs but never been asked for them but I don't subcontract but the amount of unqualified people I see buying refrigerant even propane based is a joke,not to mention too much but they purchase ofn and use regulators that are not safe with improvised adaptors?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    scunny!
    Age
    29
    Posts
    302
    Rep Power
    16

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Quote Originally Posted by cadwaladr View Post
    I will wait and see what happens in 2015,got all my certs but never been asked for them but I don't subcontract but the amount of unqualified people I see buying refrigerant even propane based is a joke,not to mention too much but they purchase ofn and use regulators that are not safe with improvised adaptors?
    Itll be ok until somebody dies !

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,236
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    .

    People die all the time.

    Anybody can do anything in this world as long as you have one of two things.

    One is, you never get caught.
    The other is, if you get caught have a good lawyer.

    Most people doing wrong don't get into trouble because
    things don't often go wrong. It's when the brown stuff
    hits the spinning thing that causes the problems.

    If you do a good job, to the standards and nothing goes wrong, nobody knows.
    If you do a bad job, not to any standard and nothing goes wrong, nobody knows.

    If you do a bad job, to no standards and it goes pear shaped, it is the standards
    that are held against you and that is what they prosecute you with.

    In 2012, 5 engineers (that I know of) died while carrying out refrigeration
    based work and 67 were maimed. The ones who lived were prosecuted and
    the ones who worked to the standards were cleared of all wrong doing, the
    ones who did not were either fined or imprisoned.

    Like it or not we are our own worst enemy. From 2015 if we see dodgy dealings
    lets report it to the powers that be and lets not complain that the system is crap
    because we are the system.

    If we know that we might get into trouble if we do wrong, maybe we will act more
    responsibly.

    Just remember when the regulations were brought in, in 2007 and made law in 2009
    the powers that be gave us a grace period and a soft start. They said they would
    only police the supermarkets for the first 3 years and then role out enforcement
    as we (the industry) get used to the regulations and requirements.

    The supermarkets for the most part have been doing the correct thing, the next one
    is your big facility management companies and companies with huge amounts of property
    on the books. They are next.

    The little one man band will be left alone for a good few years until we (the industry)
    accept that better standards and regulation are here to stay.

    Regards

    Rob

    .
    Last edited by Rob White; 05-11-2014 at 03:31 PM.
    .. ... -. .----. - / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / --. --- --- -..

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Wow!
    You are on form lately Rob.
    Wise words yet again.
    Grizzly

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    telford
    Posts
    1,911
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Yes very wise and correct,another thing that worries me going off topic is the amount of estate cars being used by mainly ac guys,no vents no bulkhead no stickers with refrigerant nitro welding gear on board and kiddie seats installed? I cannot insure my van unless it has all the safety items fitted,ah well rant over.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    U.K
    Age
    48
    Posts
    517
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Quote Originally Posted by cadwaladr View Post
    Yes very wise and correct,another thing that worries me going off topic is the amount of estate cars being used by mainly ac guys,no vents no bulkhead no stickers with refrigerant nitro welding gear on board and kiddie seats installed? I cannot insure my van unless it has all the safety items fitted,ah well rant over.
    This amazes me as well, these engineers working for large and supposed reputable companies running around with all kinds of unsecured kit in a load area that was just designed to carry shopping! Almost displays a cowboy like approach to the trade?

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,236
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    .

    The trouble again is the standards we work to.

    The ADR states that to carry dangerous goods by road you have
    to do it in the correct vehicle, displaying the correct warning labels
    and with all the appropriate documentation to go with the dangerous
    substance.

    It also states that if you only carry a limited amount of stuff and
    it works on a point system, you do not have to have a ventilated
    vehicle with warning stickers on display.

    It is all down to the regulations and knowing what is and what is not
    legal. To work out of a car is seemed by some as a perk and it is
    perfectly legal to carry dangerous stuff in them as long as the regulations
    are adhered to.

    People in vans break the law when they have stickers on display but
    no stuff inside the vehicle, that the sticker is indicating. People in estate
    cars with no warning stickers are not breaking the law.

    So if you are a van driver, chances are you break the law more often than
    a car driver.

    See

    http://www.uk.airliquide.com/file/ot...2372880930.pdf

    Regards

    Rob

    .
    .. ... -. .----. - / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / --. --- --- -..

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    509
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Good points Rob.
    Mobile A/C at its best, see avatar.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    http://www.uk.airliquide.com/file/ot...2372880930.pdf

    Just a little light reading then Rob!

    Thanks Grizzly

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    5,078
    Rep Power
    42

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    This one is a little worrying....assuming that it relates to the transport of cylinders below the threshold....

    4. What will the authorities be looking for?

    The police and VOSA (Vehicle & Operator Services Agency) working with guidance
    from the HSE will be looking for breaches of the legislation. If identified the HSE
    may prosecute offenders. The police will be looking for gas cylinder labels, potential
    leaks and that appropriate securing devices have been fitted and are being utilised
    correctly. They will also satisfy themselves that the driver has been trained and
    understands the hazards and knows what to do in an emergency.

    A good friend of mine who is a flat roofer recently got stopped by VOSA and they were looking for Fire Extinguishers in his van due to the cylinders of propane that he carried. Seems like they were having a purge on vehicles carrying propane. Might be our turn next.
    I'm back on the Pale

  26. #26
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,236
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    .

    I have always said it is VOSA we need to be aware of.

    The police know as much about things like this as Joe public,
    it is the VOSA guys who set up check points and do random
    stops of vehicles as they come into and out of towns / cities.

    Rob

    .
    .. ... -. .----. - / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / --. --- --- -..

  27. #27
    hookster's Avatar
    hookster is offline Veteran Poster I am starting to push the Mods: of RE
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    431
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    I must agree having had both types of vehicles over my career, I was amazed at being allowed to drive around in an estate car packed to the gunwales and then told by the office to just go and pick up a large gas cylinder from the wholesalers!

    I personally hated the estate and the need to try and cram all my equipment into a vehicle then unload it onsite to try and get to the tools at the bottom. The van when well laid out neat and secured was the best tool in the business and made finding and carrying that extra bit of kit I was able to carry that I could not fit in the car.

    Unsecured loads in a vehicle are an accident waiting to happen and at the end of the day you just want to go to work, do your job to the best of your ability and go home to your family.

    For the employer never forget the vehicle you give your employees should be fit for purpose and ensure you are doing everything reasonably practicable to safe guard them.


    The Health and Safety at Work Act sets out the duties of the employer to ensure, so far as is
    reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees and those who
    may be affected by their work activities. This duty extends to the safety concerning the provision and
    maintenance of plant, equipment and systems of work, the safety in handling, storing and transporting
    articles and substances, and providing adequate training and supervision of employees in their work
    activities. It also makes provision concerning the possession and use of dangerous substances.
    No specific references are made in the Act concerning the safe restraint of vehicle cargo in a road
    accident, but this is implied under the duties of the act set out for the employer. Principally it is stated
    in the Act that an employer takes all reasonable and practical steps to ensure the safety and welfare of
    their employees and others that may be affected by their work activities. The requirement for
    “reasonable and practical steps” is particularly relevant for the safe restraint of cargo under accident
    conditions. It implies that specific risks may be unavoidable on the grounds that there are no
    reasonable and practical steps to completely eliminate the risk. For instance, there are inherent risks of
    falling associated with employees using ladders or flights of stairs in their work activities. It is
    impractical to consider that the risks from using ladders and stairs could be completely eliminated but
    appropriate measures should be taken to manage the risks by providing, appropriate training in the use
    of ladders and hand rails on stairwells. Similarly, in an accident it may not be possible to completely
    eliminate the risk posed by cargo carried by a vehicle as the potential accident severity may limit the
    reasonable and practical steps that could be taken to eliminate the risk of the cargo causing harm or
    injury
    I love the smell of Ammonia in the morning!

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    manchester
    Age
    44
    Posts
    5,707
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    i got stopped by vosa in inverness- they were after dodgy diy ers who rip off the elderly- 1 copper suggested that i secure a piece of 15mm speedfit as it was unsecure- it was ratchet strapped tight and had done 400 mile with no drama- i said i would secure it over on the other side of the checkpoint- whilst doing this, some woman popped up and decided she was gonna weigh me!!- a 125bhp 280 transit- my back axle was 80kg over!!- 20 mins earlier i had just put 65 quids worth of diessel- prob about 80 kg, aparently your allowed 100kg over so was a close shave, so its a good idea to go to the recycling ctr and get weighed as its not 3.5 ton limit- check your vehicle theres a data plate for front and rear axle loads

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Somerset
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,506
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Quote Originally Posted by install monkey View Post
    i got stopped by vosa in inverness- they were after dodgy diy ers who rip off the elderly- 1 copper suggested that i secure a piece of 15mm speedfit as it was unsecure- it was ratchet strapped tight and had done 400 mile with no drama- i said i would secure it over on the other side of the checkpoint- whilst doing this, some woman popped up and decided she was gonna weigh me!!- a 125bhp 280 transit- my back axle was 80kg over!!- 20 mins earlier i had just put 65 quids worth of diessel- prob about 80 kg, aparently your allowed 100kg over so was a close shave, so its a good idea to go to the recycling ctr and get weighed as its not 3.5 ton limit- check your vehicle theres a data plate for front and rear axle loads
    Enough to make me break out in a sweat!
    Good points guys, the one I feel sorry for is our Apprentice (Read cheap go for with a Van!)
    Who often fetches goods and materials, which I guess would be over the individual axle weight loads discussed above.
    "We" are all on the forum helping to educate each other on the pitfalls and I know some are management or self employed.
    Which is brilliant because they have a direct influence on what happens at the Coal Face!
    For the rest of us, Read and Learn.
    Thanks for the useful info Guys!
    Something extra to discuss at the next Engineers Meeting I Guess?
    I know our colleagues from across the different Seas have similar issues, maybe it's nice for them to realise they are not the only ones?
    Grizzly

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    england
    Age
    43
    Posts
    3,790
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Last company i worked for i had a renault master with a 1.5 ton capacity. The other guys had 1 ton mercedes vitos.

    The master had about a 300kg axle tolerance which meant you could have the 1.5 ton more near the front or more near the back, so you did not need to worry too much where you put the heavy things. With the vito the 1 ton weight would have to be in exactly the right place, which in practice meant the vehicle could be under the gvw but an axle could be overloaded.
    Mostly found in Oxfordshire, UK :)

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    U.K
    Age
    48
    Posts
    517
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: 2079 Safe Handling Certificate.

    Quote Originally Posted by hookster View Post
    I must agree having had both types of vehicles over my career, I was amazed at being allowed to drive around in an estate car packed to the gunwales and then told by the office to just go and pick up a large gas cylinder from the wholesalers!

    I personally hated the estate and the need to try and cram all my equipment into a vehicle then unload it onsite to try and get to the tools at the bottom. The van when well laid out neat and secured was the best tool in the business and made finding and carrying that extra bit of kit I was able to carry that I could not fit in the car.

    Unsecured loads in a vehicle are an accident waiting to happen and at the end of the day you just want to go to work, do your job to the best of your ability and go home to your family.

    For the employer never forget the vehicle you give your employees should be fit for purpose and ensure you are doing everything reasonably practicable to safe guard them.
    I agree 100% but.. the problem is the employee also needs to say this is not safe, I need an appropriate vehicle for the job.
    Realistically, these large firms should have the common sense to know an estate car is not a service vehicle, but maybe they are also pandering to many engineers who don't want to be seen in a van? Perhaps part of the package is a car which they can take their family out and about on the day off, a van is not so cool.

    I think you may be an exception hookster but when I see "engineers" constantly changing out of bling white trainers to their safety boots then back again when the job is finished I just think why waste your time. And I would hazard a guess that these guy's don't want to be seen in a van either. Me, I don't give a monkey's, prefer my van over anything, prefer a pair of toecaps over anything, white trainers eeek...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •