Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Age
    38
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    13

    Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress



    Contradictory to staircase or liftwell pressurization, what needs to be done to pressurize a room to avoid any toxic gas ingress during an emergency. The bottle neck here is that the fresh air intake is restricted due to the polluted air. Has someone come across the requirement where in air is stored in cylinders or something like that??

    Thanks!
    Nevin.



  2. #2
    Brian_UK's Avatar
    Brian_UK is offline Moderator I am starting to push the Mods: of RE Site Moderator : and general nice guy
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Dorset
    Age
    76
    Posts
    11,192
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Our ex local nuclear control bunker used to have hundreds of oxygen bottles all connected up and ready to go when needed.

    You new to considered how long the room will need to be sealed, a recirculating ventilation system with COČ scrubber.
    Brian - Newton Abbot, Devon, UK
    Retired March 2015

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    5,733
    Rep Power
    51

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Perhaps a VENTILATION FORUM might be able to give some advice??

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    manchester
    Age
    50
    Posts
    5,707
    Rep Power
    45

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    http://www.mcaf.co.uk/nuclear.aspx
    filtered polluted air

  5. #5
    Brian_UK's Avatar
    Brian_UK is offline Moderator I am starting to push the Mods: of RE Site Moderator : and general nice guy
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Dorset
    Age
    76
    Posts
    11,192
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian_UK View Post
    Our ex local nuclear control bunker used to have hundreds of oxygen bottles all connected up and ready to go when needed.
    I might add that when the pressure vessel directive came in they dumped all of the oxygen and took the system out of service that they didn't have to be tested.
    Brian - Newton Abbot, Devon, UK
    Retired March 2015

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Auckland
    Age
    74
    Posts
    3,362
    Rep Power
    37

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Identify the toxic pollutants then add ultra filtration ( HEPA filters ) for the lumps and catalytic convertors specific to toxic content, possibly add ozone generators as a sanitizer. All will not happen with a power supply failure so add a remote generator power supply.

  7. #7
    nevgee's Avatar
    nevgee is offline Veteran Poster I am starting to push the Mods: of RE
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Age
    72
    Posts
    420
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Petro chem industry used to use an extended fresh air in duct or stack with an inlet that would be 3 to 5 m high, depending on site and hazards. An independant input fan assembly with 100% standy would provide an over pressure of 25 to 50 Pa. All doorways would have air lock arrangement and all penetrations to the builing would be completely sealed and air tight. pressure relief to outside would be via calibrated relief valves / flaps.
    Again as Magoo suggests, HEPA filtration or in some cases carbon filters could be used at the fresh air ingress point.
    Reality is an elusion created by alcohol deficiency. Quaff and enjoy. [Yorkshire, UK]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Age
    38
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    I had suggested the idea of extended fresh air duct, but due to the nature of H2S gas, they are not willing to take the risk, even with chemical filters. Any idea how to pressurize the room considering the door is continously opened? Can I consider the "crack area" as this "door area" in my calculations? I believe this crack method is the only formula that ASHRAE has for pressurization?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Auckland
    Age
    74
    Posts
    3,362
    Rep Power
    37

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    You have to remove the toxic content, otherwise blowing to atmosphere creates a pollution issue for the rest of us mere humans.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    320
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Door is continuously open to Outdoors? If its open to an adjacent space you will be pressurizing both spaces. If the pressurization is to be implemented in emergency only, automatic door closer addresses both conditions, maybe....

    Is this a "shelter in place" room space? Many of the drilling platforms require such spaces....Lots of architectural detail involved. Check "Red Dog" for the land based units.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Age
    38
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Quote Originally Posted by Magoo View Post
    You have to remove the toxic content, otherwise blowing to atmosphere creates a pollution issue for the rest of us mere humans.
    Yes, we do that with a chemical filter medium. For O&G industry, our concern is with H2S gas, and this is the main reason we are planning to make a Gas Refuge Area, for 1-2hours. (Could help emergency services to arrive in that time frame)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Age
    38
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Concept.jpg

    This is the concept. In case of gas leak in the process area, the air lock needs to be pressurized continously even with both the doors opened as personals will be entering the refuge through the air lock. I thought the idea of interlocking the doors, but during an emergency all would be panicking and this would not help.

    Inside the refuge, the HVAC system shall run in recirculation mode. All fresh air intake dampers shall be closed in case of gas detection. Only air lock shall take fresh air from process/ambient, treat it in chemical filters and then supplied for required pressurization purpose.

    Now, since both doors needs to be considered as "open crack", can I use the ASHRAE orifice equation here as well?

    Thanks!
    Nevin.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Age
    38
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Guys,

    I'm still waiting for suggestions. . . . . Anyone?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    3,356
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    I just looked up "design of toxic refuge" & there seems to be a lot of information.

    To me you cannot have doors continuously open.
    everyone should be accounted for then keep doors shut.
    It talks about being able to withstand a blast, air cylinders to supply air, air monitoring within space &
    a flush if air polluted & lots more.

    I would say a specialist area of design.

    on phone so can't attach links
    Last edited by RANGER1; 26-05-2014 at 01:51 AM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Age
    38
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Yes, unfortunatly these information available limits itself with a portable container. It points to an OEM with compressed air storage and limited to 20-30 people. . .

    If the doors are not kept open, do you think the personal on site will "wait" for the air lock doors to get opened? Even with that, there's a chance that the toxic gas would go inside the shelter, and this needs to be avoided at the first place!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    3,356
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    [QUOTE=nevinjohn;296199]Yes, unfortunatly these information available limits itself with a portable container. It points to an OEM with compressed air storage and limited to 20-30 people. . .

    If the doors are not kept open, do you think the personal on site will "wait" for the air lock doors to get opened? Even with that, there's a chance that the toxic gas would go inside the shelter, and this needs to be avoided at the first place![/QUOTE

    You may misunderstand room slightly pressurized
    but doors open only when people open them momentarily or for a short period
    people should only be going in when emergency unless rescue team

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Age
    38
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Pressurization to avoid toxic gas ingress

    Yes, the shelter is planned for 200 personals. Lets say the time required by an individual is approx 3 seconds.
    Thefore 200 X 3 = 600 Seconds ; 10 minutes. So this air lock shall maintain 50Pa for 10 min duration considering both the doors opened. Any idea how to do that?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •