Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: R407f- r407a

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Philippines Islands
    Age
    59
    Posts
    29
    Rep Power
    0

    R407f- r407a



    Hello there

    I am having more and more request of systems no more utilizing R404A but R407F and R404A.
    I would stay stick on R404A, or R507, nonetheless the request of systems with these two refrigernts is increasing.

    Therefore I have started to analyze these two new refrigerants, reading threads and googling it

    Basically what I have noticed is :
    - performance of the two new refrigerants (R407A, R407F) are basically equivalent.
    - condenser capacity is lower than R404A around 15%, according to the td considered
    - evaporator capacity is higher than R404A around 10% according to the td considered.
    - R407F has high discharge temperatures, so that it seems that low temperature applications are difficoult.


    What really worries me in utilizing these two refrigerants is that they have glide (4-6K)

    are they suitable to freezing application ?

    I can see some potential problems, for example: in the coil there are colder parts where frost can form faster.

    Please may I ask you if you have an experience on this ?


    Many thanks



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Age
    48
    Posts
    1,020
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: R407f- r407a

    PaulL see my answers below

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulL View Post
    Hello there

    I am having more and more request of systems no more utilizing R404A but R407F and R404A.
    I would stay stick on R404A, or R507, nonetheless the request of systems with these two refrigernts is increasing.

    Therefore I have started to analyze these two new refrigerants, reading threads and googling it

    Basically what I have noticed is :
    - performance of the two new refrigerants (R407A, R407F) are basically equivalent.
    - condenser capacity is lower than R404A around 15%, according to the td considered
    - evaporator capacity is higher than R404A around 10% according to the td considered.
    - R407F has high discharge temperatures, so that it seems that low temperature applications are difficoult. No problem, just take take in consideration you will need additional cooling like fan at the compressor head, CIC system (like Bitzer) has it...It will be as you had use R22


    What really worries me in utilizing these two refrigerants is that they have glide (4-6K). No problem if you use dry-expansion feed

    are they suitable to freezing application ?

    I can see some potential problems, for example: in the coil there are colder parts where frost can form faster. If you are worry about that use a medium evaporating temperature, between the bubble and dew point

    Please may I ask you if you have an experience on this ?


    Many thanks
    To make progress is never good enough, I want to do better and better and better

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: R407f- r407a

    Recently modified a large supermarket from 404a to 407F as it is claimed to have a beter cop and less energie use.
    Thsi supermarket has to cooling installtions, both 85 Hp each.
    regulation is done with danfoss akm equipment all cabinets have electronic danfoss expansion valves.

    After a few weeks after initial retrofit high pressure cut out was noticed and client complained that all cabinets started to leak water.
    Ambient was nice but not extreem.

    so I was called out to investigate and correct.
    at site first had a climb to condensor as at that moment hp was tripping, arriving at condensor to check if it was dirty, i noticed that liquid return was within normal range, warm but not hot (old trusty hand check)
    so in my opinion no reason for hp trip.

    Than went into shop to check cabinets and water problem.
    Noticed that all eveporators and driptray where fully iced up, so took out the trusted gauges and went to check all pressures on sets.

    here i noticed that in control units refrigerant was set to R22, so started to compare with trusted refslide as my testo does not support r407F.

    so refering to presure and temperture noticed thas suction temp was at about -19-20 C actual and liquid at 43C

    In the and regulation was calibrated to adjust for the glide and pressure was set to proper setting af -8 suction and hp at 52

    installtion is now running fine, no problems, perfect cabinet temperatures, and no more hp tripping.

    so when retrofitting make sure proper adjustment are made so suction an discharge as within proper settings.

    btw there also is a energie monitoring and energie savings are within 12%
    When fixing things, Selling doorseals on my website.
    koelcel onderdelen

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •