Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,645
    Rep Power
    34

    Alternative leak testing technique



    Boyles law states that P * V = constant.
    When performing a pressure test or a leaktest, we mostly use a nitrogen bottle on 200 bar (2,900 psi) with a pressure regulator on it.
    Say you pressurize your system to 25 bar (360 psi) like me mostly do.
    You stabilize the flow until you notice a complete standstill in flow.
    You then can have 25 bar in you system, your manifold and in the small expansion chamber of the pressure regulator/reducer.
    But you still have 200 bar at the inlet tube and a small part of the pressure reducer.
    You then shut off the valve of the nitrogen bottle.
    You then have a system with a big V and a small P (cooling system, manifold, and ½ of the pressure regulator) compared to the high P and small V at the inlet of the pressure regulator.

    You wait some time and the smallest pressure drop that will happen in your system will result in a very fast pressure drop at the 200 bar side because you regulator tries to maintain 25 bar but there’s in that part only a very small volume available to let stabilize the lost pressure again.
    Does this make sense? Sorry if I explained this already in the past.


    It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    manchester
    Age
    50
    Posts
    5,707
    Rep Power
    45

    Re: Alternative leak testing technique

    your saying that the regulator is allowing flow into the system if there is a drop in pressure within the system. it wouldnt be a problem if after allowing for stabilisation of the system then the regulator is disconnected from the system and a valve cap is fitted to the manifold.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    ireland
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,471
    Rep Power
    41

    Re: Alternative leak testing technique

    Sounds like a good idea Peter, thank you, you rely on the regulator gauge to show the drop?

    alec
    Mostly found in the southern part of this green and pleasant land.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,645
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: Alternative leak testing technique

    Quote Originally Posted by al View Post
    Sounds like a good idea Peter, thank you, you rely on the regulator gauge to show the drop?

    alec
    Indeed but on the HP side of the regulator. A pressure drop unnoticeable on you manifold - less than the thickness of the needle - will let drop the HP gauge.
    But i not solely rely on this of course.
    It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,645
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: Alternative leak testing technique

    Quote Originally Posted by install monkey View Post
    your saying that the regulator is allowing flow into the system if there is a drop in pressure within the system. it wouldnt be a problem if after allowing for stabilisation of the system then the regulator is disconnected from the system and a valve cap is fitted to the manifold.
    It's just the fact that the regulator must remain in the system to allow the fast pressure drop. It's the pressure regulator which will tell you that the systems leaks, not the manifold
    Last edited by Peter_1; 10-07-2011 at 06:17 PM.
    It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Baltics
    Age
    62
    Posts
    786
    Rep Power
    16

    Re: Alternative leak testing technique

    Hello
    My common sense tells me the point is the precision of the regulator. If its springs/ membranes' hysteresis is low, so reactance is quick , then "high" side would open when the P at the "low" side is, let's say 24.99 B, followed by pressures equalization. If the regulator is of a worse class, then the equalization may not take place till the "low" side is, for instance, 24.5 B (with "high" side showing 200B until the moment).
    Should depend on the regulator.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,645
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: Alternative leak testing technique

    Tried already with 3 different brands with same results. But you have a point.
    We're just back from a service call on a big automated refrigerant filling system for harvester machines. There they pressurize the system for 30 seconds to 5 bar, then vacuum for 9 minutes and do a vacuumtest for 16 seconds.
    All not that long and not very high pressures IMHO to find out if system is leaktight.
    Last edited by Peter_1; 14-07-2011 at 05:54 PM.
    It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    KZN, South Africa
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,212
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: Alternative leak testing technique

    A very cunning use of Boyle's Law. Excellent Peter, thank you.
    Engineering Specialist - Cuprobraze, Nocolok, CD Technology
    Rarefied Technologies ( SE Asia )

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •