Results 51 to 73 of 73
Thread: Cable current carrying capacity
-
20-09-2005, 06:13 PM #51
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Ill tell you why I chose Peters method........even before I go 2 moro to sort it
Peters looks to me the safest option........
I have all the circuit breakers and isolators.........
Cable will be 2.5 mm size
Ill take all the readings and post 2 moro
-
20-09-2005, 06:18 PM #52
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
And its not 2.5 mm for all 6 heaters.....
Its one 2.5mm per phase
-
20-09-2005, 07:11 PM #53
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Abe,
Be adventurous and go for the other option. You can then experiment and tell us how it goes.
(you do have insurance don`t you?)IF AT FIRST YOU DON`T SUCCEED.
DESTROY ALL EVIDENCE THAT YOU TRIED!
and go get a cuppa
-
20-09-2005, 07:44 PM #54
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Originally Posted by botrous
We even installed safety motor current trippers instead of a fuse. So you can dial in very precise the current.
We then use the aux contact to trigger an alarm.
Same for protecting a transformer.
Regarding the current in the neutral due to an earth leak: in Belgium, the earth leak protetcor must cut-out when there is a leak of more than 300mA (in many cases even 30 mA)!, so this is not a big current.
When they're wired in serie - and suppose you wired the 2 drain pan heaters together - and one heater of the 2 fails, then all the water in the drain pan will become in ice, even so worse that it will push the drain pan away (seen it many times)
This isn't unsafe but you've inserted a possible fault that could give serious troubles.
We try to avoid possible errors.
In Belgium, it's not obligated to run the neutral over the contactor nor the main heater fuse. It may connected straigth to a 'neutral bar'
We never do this for the following reason: if you have an earth leak and all the neutrals are wired together, then it's almost impossible to find the eartleak. You have to losen all the screws on the bar beacause if you megger the circuit, the fault is everywhere and nowhere.
In an unbalanced system 3 phase system, there is always more current flowing through the live wires then the neutral but this doens't mean that there is an earth fault.
The example with the simulation shows this perfect.
We never calculate the AMPS for the neutral, just use a 5 wire cable.
Abe, it's indeed 2.5 mm² for every wire.
Another thing, we allways install a mechanical safety thermostat on the roof of a freezer and don't tell the client it's there. We dial in a fix setting and remove the knob of it.
We already had serious damage due to a failing electronic end-defrost systems.
We once had 7 ton of chicken meat in a poultry quick freezer which went to 95°C (!!) during the weekend.
Happily we were insured for this.
It was more a cooker then a freezer.
And once a freezer with +/-1.500 pastries in it in a bakery freezer.It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
20-09-2005, 07:58 PM #55
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Sure, other methods can work fine.
-
20-09-2005, 09:13 PM #56
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
If you search once in the history of this forum, you will find exactly the same discussion.
The theory behind all this is the Law of Kirchoff and Marc O'Brien mentioned also the Thévenin Theorem which I forgot completely.
It all depends how many heaters are connected to the 3 phase system.
If more then 3 and some are connected in parallel without a neutral wire, then this is for the heaters - not the user - an unsafe situation.
Sure, connecting two in serie on 1 line is not unsafe as long as you don't connect heaters in parallel.
But connecting them in serie makes the installation more failure sensitive (if this is the correct English expression)
Other safety devices which can be used: overvoltage arresters, varistors, ... These devices works also fine but these are expensive solutions if you can use instead the (cheap) neutral wire.
We sometimes use varistors - which are very cheap - for the SV's in market trucks to protect them against overvoltage
Has nobody encountered in real life problems when the neutral is sudden lost along the electricity lines (outside your house)?
It was in the news some weeks ago but a worker here very nearby had in a transformer house disconnected the neutral accidendaly and +/- 160 houses had serious failures on electric components.
Still haven't got any other answers for the moment from manufacturers.
But why not try somebody this in theorey with some light bulbs and convince yourself? I have a strong feeling that this is something that most of us aren't aware of.
Take 8 bulbs of 220 VAC in 8 cheap sockets and connect them to a 3 phase 380-400 V power supply and see what happens.
Take voltage and AMP readings on the lines.
An example shows sometimes more than 1000 words.Last edited by Peter_1; 20-09-2005 at 09:17 PM.
It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
23-09-2005, 07:11 PM #57
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Dear Sir,
The elements connected in our coolers are always connected in star with a neutral line.
The reason is what you already say in your mail.
Some people connect the elements in our cooler without the neutral.
The number of elements is than always divided by 3.
If, in this case, one of the elements fails, the problem of unbalance arise.
Our "professsional" advice is, Use a neutral.
Best regards
Digni van der Zande
Office Sales Manager
Goedhart Cooling EquipmentIt's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
23-09-2005, 08:08 PM #58
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
If, in this case, one of the elements fails, the problem of unbalance arise.
with the correct safety measures in place
-
23-09-2005, 08:16 PM #59
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Anyone tried the set-up with the light bulbs and unscrewing some to see what happens with the voltage?
It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
23-09-2005, 09:33 PM #60
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Going by Franks wireing diagram, would you really get 240 v between phase and star-point?
If you think about the wave form of 3 phase, and then think about what you are doing with it.
When you measure between 2 phases you should get 415v , but then you introduce a third phase, this is out of sync with the other 2 by 120deg giving you 180v between any phase and star-point.
I think!!!!!
just throwing in some ideas.IF AT FIRST YOU DON`T SUCCEED.
DESTROY ALL EVIDENCE THAT YOU TRIED!
and go get a cuppa
-
23-09-2005, 09:45 PM #61
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
The star point is a neutral point , the voltage between the start point and any of the phases should be equal to voltage between 2 phases devided by the square root of 3...
RegardsEngineering, sciences, math, physics and my brain will generate "not responding " soon
-
23-09-2005, 09:56 PM #62
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
23-09-2005, 10:31 PM #63
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
All of those links seem only to be concerned with currant and not voltage, which is what im talking about.
botrous.. I know the star-point is called 'neutral' but its not an actual no volts dead spot is it?
I will continue my googling.
Any points to prove/dissprove me are welcomed.IF AT FIRST YOU DON`T SUCCEED.
DESTROY ALL EVIDENCE THAT YOU TRIED!
and go get a cuppa
-
23-09-2005, 11:39 PM #64
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
All six heaters connected. 2 heaters per phase off a three phase supply
2 X 1500 watt heaters connected per phase
All of one 18 Amp Contactor
These are the readings.
12 amps draw per phase, so Im assuming each heater is drawing 6 amps
Each phase protected by a 16 amp type B circuit breaker and a 20 amp cartridge fuse at main Distribution box
Neutrals are ALL linked into one bus bar.
Ill go to site again next Wednesday to see if Evaporator is clear
I need to ask one other question
The drain line heater is permanently on and gets quite hot.
It is not self regulating.
Is that safe??
-
24-09-2005, 07:26 AM #65
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Originally Posted by chillin out
The star point in NOT always A neutral point and certainly not THE neutral point. It's only neutral in a balanced field. In a balanced set-up it's indeed a 0-volt point and you don't have to connect it, ...like in an electrical motor where all 3 windings, so the load are equal.
Prove/dissaprove...go to the nearest electrical shop and buy for 5£ of material and a practical test shows more then 1000 words. But as I said previous, try to understand why this happens.
Google on Kirchoff and Thévenin.Last edited by Peter_1; 24-09-2005 at 07:40 AM.
It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
24-09-2005, 11:40 AM #66
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
In a balanced set-up it's indeed a 0-volt point and you don't have to connect it, ...like in an electrical motor where all 3 windings, so the load are equal.
Chillin out , that's what I meant to sayEngineering, sciences, math, physics and my brain will generate "not responding " soon
-
24-09-2005, 05:43 PM #67
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
When you measure between 2 phases you should get 415v , but then you introduce a third phase, this is out of sync with the other 2 by 120deg giving you 180v between any phase and star-point.
What you are seeing is the third phase acting as a neutral due to the phase shift. If you only have 2 phases requiring a neutral then a wire is needed. But with a balanced 3 phase load you do not need a neutral wire as one phase always acts as a neutral current path.
Have you ever noticed that you can measure voltage upto the load but only current from the load?
-
24-09-2005, 10:10 PM #68
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Thought about it and found that all I have to do is go to a comp which is wired in star (arctic circle as the star point is accessable) and measure it there, will do that tomorrow.(unless I get called out again tonight )
Have you ever noticed that you can measure voltage upto the load but only current from the load?IF AT FIRST YOU DON`T SUCCEED.
DESTROY ALL EVIDENCE THAT YOU TRIED!
and go get a cuppa
-
25-09-2005, 07:17 AM #69
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Between each fase and the copper star-bridge, you will measure 220 V.
Measure once between the bridge and earth (the copper lines connected to th compresser -->O V) and between a fase and the copper of the lines connected to the compresser (again 220 V)
Do you understand what's happening?It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
25-09-2005, 05:29 PM #70
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
I think all is clear now, went to a site today and took measurements. 240v between phase and bridge.
Thanks all,IF AT FIRST YOU DON`T SUCCEED.
DESTROY ALL EVIDENCE THAT YOU TRIED!
and go get a cuppa
-
25-09-2005, 08:33 PM #71
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
What was the reading between line and ground and between bridge and ground?
If you haven't measured it, what should the reading be?It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
25-09-2005, 09:47 PM #72
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
Didn`t measure it,
between line and ground
between bridge and groundIF AT FIRST YOU DON`T SUCCEED.
DESTROY ALL EVIDENCE THAT YOU TRIED!
and go get a cuppa
-
25-09-2005, 10:23 PM #73
Re: Cable current carrying capacity
You got it and I'm sure this is something you will now never forget anymore.
If you have some time, do once the test with the bulbs, you will learn even a lot more.It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
Similar Threads
-
Compressor Capacity
By engrkate in forum FundamentalsReplies: 15Last Post: 13-10-2006, 12:11 AM -
R-407C and Coil Capacity
By glabah in forum RefrigerantsReplies: 5Last Post: 03-06-2006, 11:36 AM -
Capacity achievement
By Hemant Anand in forum IndustrialReplies: 8Last Post: 18-12-2005, 01:18 AM -
New Capacity Control Solution
By embrown in forum New TechnologiesReplies: 19Last Post: 30-12-2003, 01:33 PM -
TEV capacity related to pressure drop
By DaBit in forum CPU OverclockersReplies: 8Last Post: 06-12-2002, 05:11 PM