Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: OFN or NOT?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    112
    Rep Power
    20

    OFN or NOT?



    A few years back i had a conversation with a technical engineer who was into his refrigerants. He suggested that the molecular size of R410a (or at least its components) was smaller than a molecule of OFN. He advised using helium to pressure test rather than OFN as it would find any leaks. I have asked equipment manufacturers, BOC, and other people and have not had a straight answer from anyone, the most common answer being, well we have always used OFN and not had any problems.

    SO, was the techi correct, but the need to use helium to small to worry about?

    For info i am currently employed by a large Japanese manufacturer and get the same vague answers everyone else have given. Am i flogging a dead horse?

    Thanks



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,058
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    No, you're not flogging a dead 'un.

    By and large he was correct. But times change and so do practices.

    At one time it was commonplace to do all testing with the refrigerant in use on the equipment but that is now not allowed. (at least in the UK)

    OFN is cheap and relatively portable that is why it is favoured on sites as an initial test. You can use the same stuff direct to atmosphere for purging too.

    It is true that most Fluorocarbons have a smaller molecular structure that Nitrogen but it doesn?t always follow that they will leak where Nitrogen will not. Nitrogen will identify problem leaks at site ? a further test with the charge added is always a good idea when the charge is added to make sure.

    Helium used for testing joints in refrigeration gear is high purity and expensive ?it?s not the stuff you put in balloons!

    The advantage with helium is that its molecular structure allows fugitive leaks to show up rapidly where other substances may leak very slowly. This helps to identify microscopic porous material. For this reason Helium is in use in controlled factory production, where a high degree of leak tightness is needed particularly on welded joints.

    Hermetic compressor cases are a good point in question. In these instances the technique of testing is different and opposite to the one you would use at site. The helium is on the outside of the item being tested and is drawn in by negative pressure if there is a leak.

    A typical technique goes like this; the item to be tested, with a vacuum pump attached, is placed in a sealed chamber which is then pressurised with a small amount of Helium on the outside of the item. The exhaust of the Vacuum pump is taken through a mass spectrometer that analyses the helium content that would enter the item being tested if it had a leak. The same technique is used in manufacture of absorption equipment, particularly as the shells are subject to vacuum pressure in use.

    This is the ultimate in leakage testing, though not really suitable for site use, because it is an expensive process all round.

    Some of the Japanese manufacturers that I know of use a variation of this on thier production lines.

    Hope this helps.
    ________
    Rolls-Royce V-8 (1905)
    Last edited by Argus; 07-02-2011 at 09:10 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ISRAEL
    Age
    72
    Posts
    4,266
    Rep Power
    46

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    Hy Dad,

    We have dscussed the subject in the past.

    It is advised to use OFN with some Helium ,about 10%.

    The results are very good and every little leak is found quick and easy.

    Chemi

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    East Anglia
    Posts
    1,171
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    Hi Chemi,

    Sounds good only one problem

    I already carry:- 2x404 2x22 1x134,408,409 2 ofn 1oxy 1acy 1 reclaim plus tools and parts. I must be getting near to my GVWand thats without me getting inAnd then add another bottle of helium

    What happened to the good old days of carrying R12/R502 and that done everything

    Regards

    Fatboy

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ISRAEL
    Age
    72
    Posts
    4,266
    Rep Power
    46

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    QWhat happened to the good old days of carrying R12/R502 and that done everything
    Hi Raymond

    You can get Helium in small bottles.


    Funny you mention it cause just yesterday, I got a contract from an old Hotel. all the fridges and freezers run on R-12 and R-502

    Need to replace two compressors.
    Any suggestions?

    Chemi
    Last edited by chemi-cool; 17-11-2004 at 08:21 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    East Anglia
    Posts
    1,171
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    Hi Chemi,

    I am also doing a lot of hotels at the moment and wat i am finding is the only time they see an engineer is when it's too late and they have blow the compressor.

    First thing i would do although i am sure you have done it already is have a GOOD look at the units and list everything that need or will need doing shortly. door seals, fan motors, condensers, compressors, driers, gas and labour.Go through the lot and then see if it's worth repairing them. I know it's good for service business going back because the old units keep breaking down but at the end of they day would it just be worth replacing he units.

    Personally i would normally use 409 on the fridges and 408 on the freezers but obviously it depends what compressor you get. These small units there is no way to flush the systems if they have burnt out so i dont like converting to poe unless the compessor has to be a poe

    Regards

    Raymond
    Last edited by Latte; 17-11-2004 at 08:58 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ISRAEL
    Age
    72
    Posts
    4,266
    Rep Power
    46

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    Hi Raymond.

    Absolutely right. These hotel people are funny.
    The first thing I do when I get there' is looking at whats cooking for lunch and what time, the girls are having coffee

    It is impossible to get 408 and 409 over here. Don't know why.

    R12 and R502 are easy to get though and so are new compressors for these refrigerants.

    Door seals are hard to find so special ones have to be ordered.

    Chemi

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.K.-London
    Posts
    144
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    If You used 100% Helium and you were rubbish at Brazing, everybody on site would be talking like fools.
    Never underestimate anybody, you never know when they will make you look like an idiot!

  9. #9
    rbartlett's Avatar
    rbartlett Guest

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    Quote Originally Posted by chemi-cool
    Hi Raymond.

    Absolutely right. These hotel people are funny.
    The first thing I do when I get there' is looking at whats cooking for lunch and what time, the girls are having coffee

    It is impossible to get 408 and 409 over here. Don't know why.

    R12 and R502 are easy to get though and so are new compressors for these refrigerants.

    Door seals are hard to find so special ones have to be ordered.

    Chemi
    Hmm

    some kind of export business Opportunity exists here..;-)

    cheers

    richard

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Venezuela
    Posts
    58
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    Quote Originally Posted by rbartlett
    Hmm

    some kind of export business Opportunity exists here..;-)

    cheers

    richard

    If you easily can get ***** 12 then the market for replacements maybe are rather limited.

    Jan Steen

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    uk
    Age
    77
    Posts
    61
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    Hi....I am a new guy to this site ...last week I was chatting to a citb guy who told me that when he mentioned the above to a prominent Japanese manufacturer he was told..."we do not want you to look for very minor leaks in our systems too hard"...was this said tongue in cheek I wonder??...I look forward to reading the site on a regular basis....regards Superheatman.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ISRAEL
    Age
    72
    Posts
    4,266
    Rep Power
    46

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    I look forward to reading the site on a regular basis....
    Hi Superheatman,
    Welcome, I hope you will consider posting once in a while

    Chemi

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    southern england
    Age
    69
    Posts
    86
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    It is an offence under the eviromental protection act to knowingly put a leaking system onto the market. Any engineer installing such equipment would also be breaking the law.
    it's only a fridge, fix it. ;)

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,058
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: OFN or NOT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Superheatman
    Hi....I am a new guy to this site ...last week I was chatting to a citb guy who told me that when he mentioned the above to a prominent Japanese manufacturer he was told..."we do not want you to look for very minor leaks in our systems too hard"...was this said tongue in cheek I wonder??...I look forward to reading the site on a regular basis....regards Superheatman.
    Very much tongue in cheeck, I'm afraid......

    Everyone knows that the Japanese are renowned for their sense of humour.
    ________
    vaporizer wholesaler
    Last edited by Argus; 07-02-2011 at 09:11 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •