Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
24-07-2009, 09:40 PM #1
can testing a system bring more harm than good
There are three water chillers (R134a) on a site. Two are working more or less bearable but the third triping on LP. I heard a version its evaporator to be dirty, but I have spent several days measuring SHs, SCs etc on all systems, and besides, water pressure drop on this is even the smallest. My version is shortage of refrigerant.
But can what I insist upon - decanting (to weigh against the norm on the nameplate), vacuuming and pressure testing - turn more harmful than letting things status quo ?
Both are refrigerant-to-water - the evap and condenser. If a burst develops during the procedure and the system sucks in water it will be disaster ! Maybe let the sliping dog lie and recommend just adding from time to time some refrigerant ?
-
24-07-2009, 10:40 PM #2
Re: can testing a system bring more harm than good
You say that the water pressure drop is the smallest.
If this is the pressure across the evaporator then it would indicate a low water flow unless you have some other form of water flow measurement available to contradict this.Brian - Newton Abbot, Devon, UK
Retired March 2015
-
24-07-2009, 11:15 PM #3
Re: can testing a system bring more harm than good
-
24-07-2009, 11:17 PM #4
Re: can testing a system bring more harm than good
-
25-07-2009, 12:09 AM #5
-
25-07-2009, 01:52 AM #6
Re: can testing a system bring more harm than good
Isolate water and drain if your worried .
If its shell and tube evap or condenser the tube plate should be leak tested anyway for leaks .
-
25-07-2009, 07:04 AM #7
Re: can testing a system bring more harm than good
wouldnt have thought it would be running in a vaccum,different designs for applications i spose lol
mmm to beer or not to beer...........lets drink breakfast
-
25-07-2009, 08:23 AM #8
Re: can testing a system bring more harm than good
Thanks for all your replies.
By Brian UK:
pressure drop is the smallest.
If this is the pressure across the evaporator then it would indicate a low water flow
Before the all the evaporators there are 2 pumps, only 1 is being used.
One manometer is at input of the evap (after the pump) another at evap's output.
P drop is 2 B on the "good" chillers, and only 0.4 B across the evap of the "bad" one.
Have experimented with water flow: half-closed the valve (before the pump) - P drop had not changed very much, switched on the second pump - again P drop remained the same.
Motors in pumps (seemingly the pumps themselves as well) are identical, those at "good" chillers draw 22A, the motor of the "bad" one - 18A. But: the "good" chillers are a bigger model (York LCHH....130) than the "bad" (LCHH...110). So for el current difference I would account solely by difference in evap-s sizes.
-
25-07-2009, 04:40 PM #9
Re: can testing a system bring more harm than good
By Gary:
Not to worry. The compressor valves will break long before the condenser bursts.
By Ranger1:
Isolate water and drain if your worried .
Similar Threads
-
Capillary Tube Characteristics
By Chef in forum FundamentalsReplies: 9Last Post: 10-03-2009, 01:03 PM -
Enthalpy Increasing Buffer System
By Reflexive in forum Technical SpeculationsReplies: 3Last Post: 23-12-2008, 03:18 PM -
What is System balance?
By shogun7 in forum Technical SpeculationsReplies: 56Last Post: 19-01-2006, 09:47 AM -
Refrigeration system proposal; comments please.
By DaBit in forum Technical SpeculationsReplies: 13Last Post: 01-01-2003, 03:42 PM -
Automotive A/C Vent Temp Range vs System
By Don Browney in forum Air ConditioningReplies: 1Last Post: 15-05-2002, 06:19 AM