-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mad fridgie
So that is what you wanted to know.
If you drop the pressure on liquid that is on or close to its boiling, then it will boil? "yes" upto a point where an external energy source is required to continue the boiling process, the energy source need to be at a higher transmittable level than that of the boiling liquid.
i am sure that dropping pressure is what we try to do in a refrigeration circuit???
So answer your next question, the opposite could be true if the the pressure was increased an a vapour would turn into a liquid.
In both cases there are exceptions, for example "sublimation"
and yeah thats all i wanted to no, thanks for saying my measurments were wrong 20 times then suddenly i realized what happens when a liquids pressure decreases at a constant temp. CASE CLOSED lol
gees i thought when we lowered sst we lost capacity dont we.
i think we should all know how phase change occurs, ill tell u what, next time some young punk gets on the forum and starts making a mockery of the last how ever many years you said youve been a fridgey just shoot me an email and ill give you the answers youll need.
maybe ill be a young buck by then too.
besides the rare cases of co2 subliming please give me an example, from all the many years of your knowledge when a different refrigerant has had sublimaintion occur.
sorry big fella it would appear your the angry one now WONDER WHY THAT IS?, the liquid had its oown heat in the fluid itself, remember the temp stayed within A DIFFERENTIAL of 0.0K AND 0.5K THE WHOLE MOVIE, by changing the pressure at a constant temp we will have the fluid start to become a SATURATED LIQUID or a subcooled liquid depending on which way the pressure goes... AND THIS STATEMENT YOU WROTE..
"yes" upto a point where an external energy source is required to continue the boiling process, the energy source need to be at a higher transmittable level than that of the boiling liquid.
EXTACTLY RIGHT SO IT IS CLEARLY NOT A SATURATED VAPOUR IS IT???????????????????? AS PREVIOUSLY STATED
AS WE DIDNT HAVE THAT EXTERNAL HEAT SOURCE SO HAHAHAHAHAHA
....
oh yeah u wrote
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mad fridgie
Saturated vapour is what it is.
you have stated that the pressure changes, the liquid boils and conds, so your vapour at the interface will be saturated, and in the slight glass with turbulent mixing will also be saturated, during the process due to velocity and localized pressure differentials, could offer vapour either in a supercooled state or its own micro pressure envelope.
...edited...
EVERYONE WHEN MS MAD WRITES THIS -so your vapour at the interface will be saturated, and in the slight glass with turbulent mixing will also be saturated, during the process due to velocity and localized pressure differentials, could offer vapour either in a supercooled state or its own micro pressure envelope.
....
the fact is subcooled liquid started a phase change, because the pressure decreased 9 psi at a constant liquid temp, no external heat source was present to allow the phase chage to go any further and the pressure rised again so the liquid simply went back to a subcooled state SIMPLY REALLY
...edited ....
anyways back to now .
i never once said it boils i wrote
....
besides the rare cases of co2 subliming please give me an example, from all the many years of your knowledge when a different refrigerant has had sublimaintion occur.
are you a turtle cause i really think you should pull your head in.......
...edited....
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
The world is simply a mirror, reflecting back to us our own inner state. If we are inwardly in turmoil then we are certain to see a tumultuous world. A seemingly joyous world is only returning to us our own inward joy. What we see is a reflection of our state of consciousness.
What type of world do you live in rjsinoz?
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Monkey.
Your words, or should I say the words of your beliefs.
Are Stunning!
You don't use them enough, in my opinion.
Your words risinoz are just hollow!
Words used correctly have substance!
You have managed to achieve upsetting many on this forum.
Well done!
I hope your persistence is worth it.
Grizzly
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjsinoz
and yeah thats all i wanted to no, thanks for saying my measurments were wrong 20 times then suddenly i realized what happens when a liquids pressure decreases at a constant temp. CASE CLOSED lol
gees i thought when we lowered sst we lost capacity dont we.
i think we should all know how phase change occurs, ill tell u what, next time some young punk gets on the forum and starts making a mockery of the last how ever many years you said youve been a fridgey just shoot me an email and ill give you the answers youll need.
maybe ill be a young buck by then too.
besides the rare cases of co2 subliming please give me an example, from all the many years of your knowledge when a different refrigerant has had sublimaintion occur.
sorry big fella it would appear your the angry one now WONDER WHY THAT IS?, the liquid had its oown heat in the fluid itself, remember the temp stayed within A DIFFERENTIAL of 0.0K AND 0.5K THE WHOLE MOVIE, by changing the pressure at a constant temp we will have the fluid start to become a SATURATED LIQUID or a subcooled liquid depending on which way the pressure goes... AND THIS STATEMENT YOU WROTE..
"yes" upto a point where an external energy source is required to continue the boiling process, the energy source need to be at a higher transmittable level than that of the boiling liquid.
EXTACTLY RIGHT SO IT IS CLEARLY NOT A SATURATED VAPOUR IS IT???????????????????? AS PREVIOUSLY STATED
AS WE DIDNT HAVE THAT EXTERNAL HEAT SOURCE SO HAHAHAHAHAHA
see what happens when you get angry and write a post all because a 27 year old who just got out of the nick proves u wrong..,.
oh yeah u wrote
do you actually read what you write when your angry, listen to yourself you sound drunk.....
to me thats embarrasing at least at the end of the day after everything i wrote i found the answer. you are just making things up now abit like that $100,000 rig you made to prove why this problem occurs in the first place.
EVERYONE WHEN MS MAD WRITES THIS -so your vapour at the interface will be saturated, and in the slight glass with turbulent mixing will also be saturated, during the process due to velocity and localized pressure differentials, could offer vapour either in a supercooled state or its own micro pressure envelope.
WHAT HE IS SAYING IS IM TRYING TO SOUND REALLY SMART SO I DONT LOOK LIKE AN IDIOT.
the fact is subcooled liquid started a phase change, because the pressure decreased 9 psi at a constant liquid temp, no external heat source was present to allow the phase chage to go any further and the pressure rised again so the liquid simply went back to a subcooled state SIMPLY REALLY
and every good fridgey nows im right regardless of there personal opintion of me, oh yeah geuss what big pony and ms MAD a PT CHART would have and could have recoreded all of this happening if i had only used a better sensor ah well,
luckliy i didnt spent $100,000dollars like Ms MAD did to build a rig then find out a large presure drop occured and thats why liquid flashes ,woundnt i feel silly...
better yet id feel even more stupid if i told a forum i had to build a $100,000 rig to fing out why the liquid flashed in a liquid line due to a decreased mass flow rate....
anyways back to your lies......
i never once said it boils i wrote
besides the rare cases of co2 subliming please give me an example, from all the many years of your knowledge when a different refrigerant has had sublimaintion occur.
are you a turtle cause i really think you should pull your head in.......
one last thing anyone wonder why i havent been banned from this website.....
i think its because i do know what im talking about and im not making crap up as i go along to suit my argument
and who ever is actually running the site reliases this.
BYE BYE BIG PONY
BYE BYE Ms MAD
just remember a scum bag jail bird, just schooled you too, but hey as you say your both willing to learn something new, so i suppose your happy.
hahahahahahahaahahahahahhahahhahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahaah
Hi Ryan,
so without your ramblings, what have you discovered, "technically"?
Can you keep it simple as I still in the learning phase of my refrigeration career.
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Clearly obvious.
Not to go onto this website without buying a mass flow sensor or Richie sensor and to think about the most reasonable answer when attempting to find Out why liquid starts to flash as 99% of the time it's simply oh yeah to not to ask engineers such as yourself for your thoughts as I receive silly responses and your all to gutless to say what you really think in fear of what others might think of you what did I learn. Oh one other thing I'd love to hear you explain your thought on how compression ratio changes on a freezer rack by adding a subcooler which is run from a stub off a med temp rack just reading all posts last night and really can't figure out what I mean as say spent change and Scp doesn't change so where's the energy saving in that case well besides a smaller condenser
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Sorry auto spell SUCTION pressure or head presure
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjsinoz
Clearly obvious.
Not to go onto this website without buying a mass flow sensor or Richie sensor and to think about the most reasonable answer when attempting to find Out why liquid starts to flash as 99% of the time it's simply oh yeah to not to ask engineers such as yourself for your thoughts as I receive silly responses and your all to gutless to say what you really think in fear of what others might think of you what did I learn. Oh one other thing I'd love to hear you explain your thought on how compression ratio changes on a freezer rack by adding a subcooler which is run from a stub off a med temp rack just reading all posts last night and really can't figure out what I mean as say spent change and Scp doesn't change so where's the energy saving in that case well besides a smaller condenser
I will ignore your rants, however you do ask some good questions, that some may fear to ask. (but the answer can be simple or as complicated as you wish)
In simple terms, sub cooling changes the ratio of liquid boiling/vaporizing which is used for net refrigeration effect. In the evap this called "vapour fraction", so the more sub cooling, the more of the main liquid stream to evaporate "latent heat" for cooling what you want cool.
The first thing the liquid has to do before it can cool the product, is to cool it self down, this done by reducing the pressure in the first instance, and then by evaporating part of the total liquid mass to cool the remained of the liquid mass. You are familiar with a PT chart, now try a PH chart which brings energy content into the equation.
Because the energy removed during the sub cooling process, is more efficient than the original LT rack, then a energy input saving is made.
Does liquid sub cooling change compression ratio, yes and no (not the answer that you want), because your mass flow can be reduced and your surface area/flow remains constant, then your LMTD increases, there for a lower compression ratio is required to meet the new equilibrium, but if the cond fans are controlled, then discharge will remain constant, because you are adjust the LMTD to meet a fixed process variable (yes it is fixed but could be a variable) In the instance of a high pressure drop evap, SST normally rises, as the pressure drop through the evap reduces as less flash gas enters, and as you know per mass, vapour causes a greater pressure drop compared to the same mass of liquid through said pipe.
But if the evap is a low pressure drop evap and has not been circuited to low flash gas, then performance of the evap can drop because in-sufficent turbulence occurs at the beginning of the evap reducing dramatically the heat transfer co-efficient. Which then of course drop the outlet saturated pressure/temp, lowing the compressor suction and increasing the compression ratio.
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
lol thats all I can say about him at this point, I comemerate you on your patience mad, perhaps at some point he'll grasp the concept.
As for you op: go find a pdf on Building an efficient system, on the benifits of slhx on R-12 and hydrocarbon blended systems, and on active subcooling systems.
perhaps if you read it your self and see the picturs it may help.
tried to make it simpler and put them here but allas a 100kb limmit is kinda antiquidated
fyi I think you need to school your self considerably more befor you could even begin to try with us here "mate"
Atm the mods are showing you mercy and giving you a chance to redeem your self, do not waste it, other wise you will get learn the difference ells where!!
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mad fridgie
I will ignore your rants, however you do ask some good questions, that some may fear to ask. (but the answer can be simple or as complicated as you wish)
In simple terms, sub cooling changes the ratio of liquid boiling/vaporizing which is used for net refrigeration effect. In the evap this called "vapour fraction", so the more sub cooling, the more of the main liquid stream to evaporate "latent heat" for cooling what you want cool.
The first thing the liquid has to do before it can cool the product, is to cool it self down, this done by reducing the pressure in the first instance, and then by evaporating part of the total liquid mass to cool the remained of the liquid mass. You are familiar with a PT chart, now try a PH chart which brings energy content into the equation.
Because the energy removed during the sub cooling process, is more efficient than the original LT rack, then a energy input saving is made.
Does liquid sub cooling change compression ratio, yes and no (not the answer that you want), because your mass flow can be reduced and your surface area/flow remains constant, then your LMTD increases, there for a lower compression ratio is required to meet the new equilibrium, but if the cond fans are controlled, then discharge will remain constant, because you are adjust the LMTD to meet a fixed process variable (yes it is fixed but could be a variable) In the instance of a high pressure drop evap, SST normally rises, as the pressure drop through the evap reduces as less flash gas enters, and as you know per mass, vapour causes a greater pressure drop compared to the same mass of liquid through said pipe.
But if the evap is a low pressure drop evap and has not been circuited to low flash gas, then performance of the evap can drop because in-sufficent turbulence occurs at the beginning of the evap reducing dramatically the heat transfer co-efficient. Which then of course drop the outlet saturated pressure/temp, lowing the compressor suction and increasing the compression ratio.
....edited...
Well executed perfectly said an excellent response thank you that's all I wanted from you to begin with, I understood it all and never thought about it that way.....
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Oh, Ding Ding....Round 2 and i missed the start.:cool:
MG pony is correct Ryan, You have evaded the noose so far.
I can only guess that some of your comments, after skimming over the derogatory sections, shows you have the ability to resolve technical issues, and that might add points in your favour.
Communication with colleagues and having an open mind is sadly lagging.
BTW, you are damn lucky to have Mad F responding to your posts.... ;)
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
monkey spanners
The world is simply a mirror, reflecting back to us our own inner state. If we are inwardly in turmoil then we are certain to see a tumultuous world. A seemingly joyous world is only returning to us our own inward joy. What we see is a reflection of our state of consciousness.
What type of world do you live in rjsinoz?
MS, I had to insert this in Google Translate to be sure I fully understood this phrases. Wise words and so true
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Peter_1
MS, I had to insert this in Google Translate to be sure I fully understood this phrases. Wise words and so true
Knowing another language is way beyond me. Apart from a few words and sentences in Japanese that my youngest daughter taught me.
Using on-line translation seems to make a mess of: Dutch/ Hebrew/ Italian... and.....IRISH :o
Sorry Al and Stufus.:eek::D
OFF TOPIC..:off topic:
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
..edited...
d by Peter_1; 28-07-2013 at*05:43 PM.*Reason:*personally and sarcastic post
No it wasnt actuall if u read it carefully i refered to him as MR MAD Mr being key word here the rest was because i was laughing at his quick aNd excellent response i thought good on you. it didnt take 10 posts to have him tell me how it is....
Just me not many people will get much more respect than that off me.
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
I Last edited by mikeref; 28-07-2013 at*05:37 PM.*Reason:*........
What is the reason
And peter is so right your inspirational monkey........
so anyways who wants to chat about my next question whats the.state of the liquid in an accumulator
Hahahaha
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
I hope you are better fridgey than you are a con,considering my understanding of being a good crook is to evade the law and avoid "the clink".
I'm starting to wonder if this is a cry for help, surely it could not have been easy to repeatedly pick up the soap for Big Bob and the bitches.
I can't begin to Imagine how irritable it must be to have an arse-hole like a fresh bullet wound.
Wishing you all the best in your search for love (post clink) and your obvious quest for redemtion and salvation.
Cheers
Stu
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Ask him ....What??:confused:
Sorry, didn't catch that. Did you ask how he managed to avoid.....while picking up the soap?
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Meh, stufus posted before i had finished my question. So? About the soap...
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
one more thing jail was terrible, cant stress that enough.....
16hours a day locked down (NSW)
smallest meals you have ever seen
tiny little cells
everyone wants to fight to prove who is the toughest.
very limited amount of people have money ie everyone bludges smokes
but every now and agian id meet a bloke just like Santa Claus, ....
jail made me a stronger person in the end but i was only in for 20 months, ask yourself Santa, reckon you could do it
for 1 stop a loved one from getting hurt and doing what needs to be done and 2 stand up for your self while in the presence of some very bad men, somehow i think evryone reading this post and even you know you couldnt cause you are a little coward.....
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Listen mate you can sling all the flack you want in my direction ,What make's you so sure I know little about prison??
My interjection into this thread was late, agreed !! Due to the fact I've been working away all week and not had the time to read up.
Am I a fridgey ??? Not really relevant to the direction I was heading in this conversation.
So your a ****ing hero ,and a legend in your own underpants. We'll done you, Can't knock you for standing up for your family. Kudos
But neither your knowledge on refrigeration or your inflated ego cut the mustard with me .To be honest I couldn't give a flying ****.
For what it's worth I'm a lot bigger looking when you're looking up from the flat of your back.
I'm sure you are aware size counts for nothing in a street fight.
But 22yrs of mugendo ,19yrs of Kyokushin and 13 yrs of Muay Thai certainly do.
I'd much rather be called a coward than a ****ing bellend.
Idle threats mean nowt to me.
You want to carry on your keyboard warrior campaign, knock yourself out ,but at least have the dignity to take the replies on board.
BTW we can all plagiarize if the need arises.
Oh with regard to the Big Bob thing weather you are a giver or a receiver ,that's up to you !!!
Cheers
Stu
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Stu!
I heard it was your charges that were criminal!
Only joking I guess the holiday feeling has worn off.
Hopefully the working away is a good omen?
I have been doing the same all week in Cornwall (which is nice!) Sadly in a fish processing factory.
Only to be told Friday we have been awarded a contract in a chicken processing factory.
Enough to put one off their food.
I can't speak for others but this hot weather has us all running around and busy!
Musn't grumble!
Have a Guinness and raise a glass to those of us that know what we are doing!
Grizzly
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Will do Grizzly ,
You know me I'm a bit of a C.S.I Can't . Stand . Idiots
I'd imagine all 6'3 of the OP is currently sweating ,while trying to come up with a witty or most probably abusive reply.
Gives me something to do of a Sunday afternoon.
Cheers
Stu
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
When your on your knees you'll no the difference
Hey ask all your friend on the website wh[o sounds like the ****** in the last 5 post and thats comparing you with me ha have a think about that answer go on big kung fu man
And grizzly if this moron Carries on like this how good could he possibly be at anything....
Show me one statement.t besides the sheet metal question which I got wrong
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
I think there is non condensables in this thread "head pressure is rising"
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Sorry for the cards you have been dealt in the past.
But we all have issues of some sort and believe me.
If you wish to ever survive this personalised tirade of your making.
You need to realise that We help each other where we can and don't dis others if at all possible!
My friends on here have in the past been very helpful!
So like you say you had good reason for your past actions.
May I point out that there are many that may well be able to help you in the future.
But tell me why given your present responses, why they should.
If you don't like the party Leave!
Or raise a 4x and chill!
Grizzly
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Hi Ryan,
I did take it as compliment, not that i am after the glory or the insults.
There was difference between the 2 questions, the second being definable, and at that stage have feel on your knowledge,
your first question/statement because it was related to specific data was not definable, as the data could have been wrong. This then becomes a technical discussion then floats through various subjects, you will find on this site these do not need to become aggressive, even if opinions differ, as they should!
It would seem you have some level feel and passion for the industry (as most do on this forum), so I ask you to follow my kids advice "take a chill pill"
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Sweating a bit there Ryan ???
I don't recall actually saying anyone was raped !!
Maybe it was just the way you interpreted it , a bit like the advice the other posters offered you , you interpreted that to suit your own end.
Now really ,come on , do you think the man who chose to stab someone three times is in any sort of position to accuse others of being a cowards.
And don't worry about my ability ,I'm well able to hold my own.
The jury is still out on your's .
But you are keeping me amused at the moment.
Surely you can do better than that??
Cheers
Stu
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
I ran a server with what I called script skiddies like you, oh how they bragged of how they'd hack my server and erase it, crash it, put a viruse on it, and it did tend to lend me much joy of leting them into a VM and let them think they succeded just so I could ban them again.
So that was my own low end lazy day hobby, here you are dealing with a real place, if you even had a net connection by the end of it I'd be suprised
Lay off the glue / refrigerent / petrol / beer / self ritious delusions and sit back and get a clue, you are digging faster then we can lower the ladder for ya!
perhaps it is time to go live up a mountain for a few years and reflect on your life! for me it was a refreshing experiance all 5 yeras of it with just my dogs and my tools and precious little ells!
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
An entertaining post to be sure but all I can say is.....Thank god I'm pure........(LOL)
Ryan, hopefully some day life will teach you some humility, I think you would benefit from it.
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
I've never known a thread where so many Mods have had to intervene so much :eek:
Congrats to the posters for showing such restraint. :D
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
it it going to be a sticky thread?? haha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
frank
I've never known a thread where so many Mods have had to intervene so much :eek:
Congrats to the posters for showing such restraint. :D
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
frank
I've never known a thread where so many Mods have had to intervene so much :eek:
Congrats to the posters for showing such restraint. :D
Cheers Frank
You know me, Pillar of the community .
But you could have left the toothpick comment in , some of my best work was that one.
Must say I'm a little disappointed that "Big Bob" stood me up today.
Suppose we'll have to wait for the "Next big thing " to show up and enlighten us all.
Cheers
Stu
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
wondering if he gave up or was given a forced vacation?
Either way I'd give my left nut to get back up on the mountain, was so peace full and satisfying to see what you can achieve with nothing other then a pic axe and shuvel, a good riffle or bow for your food the streams chattering you asleep, the nice hum of the hydroturbine you build.
Amazing the perspective it can give you of life. Think I am going to cuddle with my dogs and watch a movie now! cheeres all and remember, life is a journy not a race so stop running and smell the flowers, they wont all ways be there!
cheeres all and raise a glass to yer fellow fridgies even if they be a prick and two glasses if they be not!
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
152 posts on a saturation physics thought experiment, and much (most) of it was not in the least related to saturation physics.
You are a patient and knowledgeable bunch of fellows, but I sure hope you all agree never to talk about sports.:)
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
without reading pages of comments where am sure the answer already is
supermarket fridge what a strange creature
no equilibrium, pressures/temps/mass flow bouncing about like yoyo's
but from hands on checks I find subcooled liquid in bottom of reciever with a saturated vapour on top
Yes refrigerant in 2 states in same vessel
whilst the refrigerant has flow it can exist in 2 different states within the same vessel
R's xChillerman
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chillerman2006
without reading pages of comments where am sure the answer already is
supermarket fridge what a strange creature
no equilibrium, pressures/temps/mass flow bouncing about like yoyo's
but from hands on checks I find subcooled liquid in bottom of reciever with a saturated vapour on top
Yes refrigerant in 2 states in same vessel
whilst the refrigerant has flow it can exist in 2 different states within the same vessel
R's xChillerman
Read the full forum Einstein someone posted why its not a saturated vapour and fyi equilibrium of saturated vapour means liquid leaving into vapour state equals vapour returning into liquid state if its not the same rat the liquid is evaporating into a gaseous vapour not saturated vapour
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjsinoz
Read the full forum Einstein someone posted why its not a saturated vapour and fyi equilibrium of saturated vapour means liquid leaving into vapour state equals vapour returning into liquid state if its not the same rat the liquid is evaporating into a gaseous vapour not saturated vapour
Again a prime example of rudeness at its best. Why you are still allowed on this forum amazes me.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
1mikeefc1
Again a prime example of rudeness at its best. Why you are still allowed on this forum amazes me.
I agree....
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjsinoz
Read the full forum Einstein someone posted why its not a saturated vapour and fyi equilibrium of saturated vapour means liquid leaving into vapour state equals vapour returning into liquid state if its not the same rat the liquid is evaporating into a gaseous vapour not saturated vapour
hey boy
if you ever in the uk look me up & I'll teach you fridge and manners as your in desperate need of both
I have a spare postage stamp where you can right your full understanding so far
so f*** y**
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chillerman2006
hey boy
if you ever in the uk look me up & I'll teach you fridge and manners as your in desperate need of both
I have a spare postage stamp where you can right your full understanding so far
so f*** y**
Haha old man
-
Re: saturated conditions in a receiver tank PROVE ME WRONG
What's happening Big Bob ???
I take it The Blue Oyster is closed today.
Still a complete twat I see!!
Cheers
Stu