Chillers?
What is the best?
R717
R290
R1270
R22
R404a
R407c
R410a
ect
plate
shell/tube
shell/plate
ect
Printable View
Chillers?
What is the best?
R717
R290
R1270
R22
R404a
R407c
R410a
ect
plate
shell/tube
shell/plate
ect
First one from both group :)
Definitely ;)
Based on what?Quote:
Originally Posted by Josip
Most chiller are R22+shell tube :)
KasperDK,what the spec for the best?
rgds
LC
Ammonia for the low mass flow and very high latent heat and good physical properties.
AND,
A plate heat exchanger. Low refrigerant charge required, higher heat transfer per unit of heat transfer surface, and smaller size and lower costs.
These should work well for the majority of the applications.
last year installed a Shell/plate(condenser and evap.) ammonia chiller with hp float vavle, with sabroe smc 106mk.4, Vacon Inverter(VLT), ca. 500kW at 6/12C
cond.40C with only 13 kg of ammonia!!!!
And in my new job iam installing 180 kw og R290 chiller plate/plate,this can be put together to produce more with 6 kg of propane(R290) no olie problems,no service problems,
are you using Freecooling wenn the temp outside is under the temp of the chiller water, iam servicing a systemther produce ca. 2 mW 14/10C water outer temp -3C
Hello KasperDk,
please come with some more details like piping diagram, description...;)
Thanks
Hi kasperDK,
This sounds like the chiller is being used as a thermosyphon with the outdoor air temperature as the heat sink.Quote:
are you using Free cooling when the temp outside is under the temp of the chiller water, i am servicing a system ther produce ca. 2 mW 14/10C water outer temp -3C
A very good idea. I have proposed this several times for various applications.
410 plate,proper D.P on heat exchanger
Hi all:)
I am tending to go for Plate and Shell both on Evaporator and Condenser. Sabroe now build a package where the evaporator is the a plate and shell, which is also the surge vessel. The condenser is a Plate and shell also with the oil separator and the HP float built into the Plate and Shell. With Ammonia Refrigerant.:)
There is nothing wrong withShell and tube heat exchangers, they have less pressure drop, but the refrigerant charge goes up along with the size;)
R22 was a good refrigerant, but we can't use it in new plant:(
R404a would be next best, but it pays to check R134a as it can be more effecient in some cases
:eek:
What abot the Turbocor option, R134a with very high COP's at part load, which is the majority of the year:D
Kind Regards. Andy:)
Is this better than a recip. compressor?? A recip. is almost linear for part load power and capacity.Quote:
What about the Turbocor option, R134a with very high COP's at part load
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
Hi andy
This is the unit or Chillpac for sabroe i have installed in denmark, its a super concept and works OK
Andy what corp. are you working for?
KasperDK
I like the spray chillers, range from 300 - 1100 Kw with a charge of 3 - 6 bottles of NH3.
the tubes are not submerged in refrigerant, rather the refrigerant is pumped from the lower drum and sprayed over the tubes via several nozzles mounted on two pipes running side by side over the tubes.
we also use plate exchangers as a condenser on these units.
http://www.pbase.com/kimmo98/image/56112421.jpg
I also like the spray chiller design. A company i was with designed and sold spray chill comopnents for others to complete. The ability to approach 32 degree f water without the problem of freeze up is a very popular design, espically in food processing.
We also sold plate and shell chillers but have pulled back from these units in the large sizes. There seems to be some thermo shock problems causing leaks in the large units
The unit design and concept is excellent just a few tech problems espically with flooded ammonia.
good to see you here bruce
tell us about yourself...
cheers
richard
Large Independant company.Quote:
Originally Posted by kasperDK
www.crossref.com
Not a corporation:eek: big firms have plenty of room for idiots, generally in abundance:D
Kind Regards. Andy:)
hi richard
nice of you to inquire about me.
I am doing consulting on cold storage facilities and a few ice plants had a design build contracting company for many years in the us. Use to be a sales engineer for frick before they were controlled by york, and who knows who
Some what of an expert in freezing and blast freezing, and system design for large and small facilities.
Also worked for a specilaty heat exchanger company, enhanced surface exchangers with a specialty towards ammonia to a fluid. Lots of titanium designs for brine .
thanks again, hope i can be of help....
david bruceboldy usa
Spray Chillers...
Can anyone provide some links for review information? I would be interested in seeing some of the design criteria, GPM/sq. ft., nozzle types, and heat transfer rates.
Thanks.
David, can you send me an email with contact information please? It appears you and I are doing similar work. It would be nice to talk to you and share some stories.
Best Regards,
US Iceman
what type compressor? looks like centrifugal oneQuote:
Originally Posted by Tycho
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
well I am new guy but 134a with wmc is the only way to go for the smalller chillers 110-300ton but dual with 134a
but i am slightly bias :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by US Iceman
recips are basiclly a waste now in the 100-300ton market you need to add a vfd with that to reach the IPLV of the turbo core
Quote:
Originally Posted by bruceboldy
We take seawater down to 28.9 F
Maybe you worked for the company we are gonna start buying or spraychillers from, it's located in Texas.
cant remember the name, but they have a new kind, with an allow they call Titek (or titech) where the tubes are welded to the endplates like on all steel chillers, instead of "rolled" when you have steel endplates and alloy tubes.
:D
Quote:
Originally Posted by lc_shi
It's a Howden XRV (twin screw)
McQuay Rep I presume.;) R134a is not that popular this side of the pond, not that effecient when compared to say R404a, which would be popular. Green Peace is trying to ban all HFC refrigerants in Europe and making head way, new Fgas regulation coming in.:(Quote:
Originally Posted by Outside Rep
Anyway it is a little hard to know which ***** to use:confused:
At present I am using mostly R404a where possible in the ***** line.
Kind Regards Andy.:)
Apparently not :DQuote:
Originally Posted by US Iceman
Check the web site out.www.turbocor.com
and decide for yourself.
Me I am using a lot a screws and VSD's;)
Kind Regards. Andy.:)
cool 404a whats that LOL yeah 134a is the new thing here 404 407 410 is only used on refigeration around here but just qouted a Airhandler with 407 since its mostly refigeration there its a abnormaly around here althoughtQuote:
Originally Posted by Andy
404 has a very low exponent, side effect of which is the low discharge temperature, in turn leading to high oil dilution and oil transport in the system. Efficient oil separators are required, especially when coupled with twin screws. When 404a is required, I normally recommend customers with 507, or setup the chiller with extremely high SH and generous oil heaters
Interesting around here the only chillers around here with those refigerents are Industrial Cooling wichs is far and few between and Ice Rinks and Ice making machines but always intrested in finding out new stuff
There was not very much useful information on the link provided. Where energy efficiency was shown on the website, it linked to an article discussing energy reduction becoming more important. Nothing was shown to provide efficiency of this compressor.
0.62 kW/ton is nothing to really brag about. Not bad, but not too impressive. You can get better than this with a recip. compressor with ammonia at full load.Quote:
Originally Posted by From McQuay Literature
If you account for the utilization of all of the heat transfer surface when part load is encountered (which is what I seem to remember about IPLV ratings) the performance actually seems to improve due to the closer approached temperatures.
I disagree. the literature does not seem to support the claim. Can someone provide data?Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
Not that many because the new refrigerants are used, or, not that many you have seen?Quote:
Originally Posted by Outside Rep
No doubt, the comfort cooling sector is a much larger market and more systems have been installed with the new refrigerants. But then again, not too many companies would install large ***** systems for industrial use.
The biggest reason for large ***** systems (in industrial use) is when the use of ammonia is not politically correct or restricted due to occupancy class.
The whole thing is that yes amonia is better but its not being used for comfort cooling
also on the industrial refigeration side it is far and few between in the area I live except for the three chocolate plants that are righ down the road
Amonia around here is very seldom used since there is not a large amount of people that know how to use it and its only used in process cooling ie chicken plants and the chocolate plants thats it
r134a is the majority of the reffer used around here since its all basicly office space and some light industrial
You could always use a secondary colesant filter as you would in Ammonia:DQuote:
Originally Posted by NoNickName
High superheats damage compressors:confused: and reduce the effeciency of the compressors, not to be recomended:)
507 is one people are investigating, effeciency is similar or better than R404a, maybe an answer to the chiller problem, but I still prefer what I know and what our engineers are familiar with.:)
R404a is very good for screws on low temp, very small oil cooler loads, if any at all:)
Kind Regards. Andy:)
Been there, done that, not working. Worse of all, counter rotation while compressor stopping takes refrigerant back in the suction together with oil, which is compressed back in the discharge when it starts once again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
Or don't start anymore :eek: and seizes for oil compression.
Your mileage may vary here. To me, SH in excess of 15°K is not an issue, as it isn't with R290 and R1270. I normally install a air to refrigerant finned coil exchanger to be installed behind the condenser coils or pipe2pipe direct transfer. Two beneficial effects: lower heat rejection in the condenser and higher SH with subsequently better refrigerant reevaporation in the oil demister.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
Oil cooler? What oil cooler? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
If you have a Non-return valve on the suction line (close to the comp.), counter rotatating should not happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by NoNickName
We have colesant filters on all our units, regardless of refrigerant, never had any problems at all with them.
do you have a line from the colesant filter section back to the compressor suction line?
just have to ask, as I've seen those without, and the point of having one without a return to the suction quite eludes me :)
Oil coolers are often used on low temp 404a screwsQuote:
Originally Posted by NoNickName
Kind Regards Andy:)
more limitations here than even in the USA:cool: only 134a chillers used for comfort cooling like hotels there was a vilter ammonia on island but the company went out of business so its no more :o ,but atleast the weather is good:)
Can't say the weathers great here, but it is nice and green:DQuote:
Originally Posted by jamcool
Kind Regrads. Andy:)
I know. The smilie was on purpose: no oil cooler, because it is not required, according to the compressor manufacturer literature. If I had an oil cooler, refrigeration dilution would be even worse.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
And for Tycho: no non-return valve on suction, no customer will pay for such a plus (4 inches suction pipe check valve costs an arm and a leg). And it would add pressure drop to the suction line.
The suction check valve should not be considered an optional item. The disc type check valves have low pressure drops.Quote:
Originally Posted by NoNickName
You could also use a high performance butterfly valve with a motorized actuator. On start-up the valve opens. On shutdown the valve closes. Very low pressure loss during operation.
I have seen some applications like this. The low specific heat ratio of some refrigerants require additional suction superheat to prevent condensing close to the compression cycle.. R-114 was similar to this also.Quote:
no oil cooler, because it is not required, according to the compressor manufacturer literature. If I had an oil cooler, refrigeration dilution would be even worse.
In some cases you have to add a heat exchanger in the suction line to specifically superheat the suction gas.
Thanks Iceman, I'm considering disc type check valve at the moment, and it seems it can be usable in my case.
And you are correct for the SH thing. An air to refrigerant superheater was added in order to increase the suction temperature from -15 to +5. This is useful SH and does not affect negatively the compressor.
Also an increased oil heater was installed to reduce refrigerant dilution at standstill.
You could also insulate the oil separator and oil lines. The large surface area of the separator rejects a lot of heat you cannot afford to loose in this condition. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by NoNickName
Is the superheat you are adding to the suction gas coming from the refrigeration system? If the superheat comes from the ambient air, the superheat is non-useful to the net refrigeration effect. The additional superheat only helps with the oil dilution problem by keeping the oil warmer.
And, if the superheat is non-useful it could cost you some compressor capacity due to the increase in specific volume.