Reeferrookie
20-12-2012, 05:17 PM
Copeland and r1150
Guys I had a question asked that I dont know the answer to and was hoping some of you industry guys can answer for me.
The question is a little vague but Im assuming the company asking reached out to Copeland and Copeland told them not to use r1150. Heres the question:
Why does Copeland consider R1150 to be such a big issue? Would we be better off using R23?
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...55534169,d.aWM (http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&ved=0CEsQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Festore.rrd.com%2FEmerson%2Fdownload.ashx%3Fdid%3D761&ei=OwXTUJ2EO9TiqAGxhYDYDg&usg=AFQjCNGrCZKaem_d8W9ipZ7K8sR5p82Udg&sig2=Ek0n6rCV-QnvaV8edirx8Q&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.aWM)
Guys I had a question asked that I dont know the answer to and was hoping some of you industry guys can answer for me.
The question is a little vague but Im assuming the company asking reached out to Copeland and Copeland told them not to use r1150. Heres the question:
Why does Copeland consider R1150 to be such a big issue? Would we be better off using R23?
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...55534169,d.aWM (http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&ved=0CEsQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Festore.rrd.com%2FEmerson%2Fdownload.ashx%3Fdid%3D761&ei=OwXTUJ2EO9TiqAGxhYDYDg&usg=AFQjCNGrCZKaem_d8W9ipZ7K8sR5p82Udg&sig2=Ek0n6rCV-QnvaV8edirx8Q&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.aWM)